VirusTotal
4 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“Firelight – The Protection Layer for Digital Assets”
allocation-firelight.foundation — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 브랜드 사칭: Firelight; 사기 유형: Generic Phishing. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 4/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); URLScan malicious verdict; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 85/100. 등록기관: PDR.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
4 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기Suspicious
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기checked — no detections recorded
보고서 열기checked — no match recorded
no community references
보고서 열기14 확인됨 — 차단 없음
No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, allocation-firelight.foundation, is identified as a crypto drainer phishing operation designed to compromise digital asset wallets. The site masquerades as Firelight, a purported protection layer for digital assets, using branding elements and messaging consistent with legitimate cryptocurrency security services. Analysis of the site’s infrastructure and content reveals the deployment of malicious scripts intended to execute unauthorized transactions, draining funds from connected wallets upon user interaction. No legitimate association with Firelight or any recognized digital asset protection service has been established, confirming its fraudulent nature. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain was registered on May 11, 2026, through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com, a registrar frequently associated with high-risk domains. It resolves to the IP address 188.114.96.3, which has been linked to other phishing campaigns targeting cryptocurrency users. As of the latest assessment, the domain appears on three security blocklists, and VirusTotal reports 4 out of 95 security vendors flagging it as malicious. The site employs technologies such as Framer Sites, React, and Cloudflare, which are commonly used in both legitimate and malicious web applications. Google Safe Browsing (GSB) has not yet listed the domain, indicating a potential gap in detection coverage. The domain is currently offline, likely due to takedown efforts or abandonment by the threat actors. However, the risk remains elevated for users who may have interacted with the site prior to its deactivation. Historical DNS records and cached content suggest the campaign was active for a limited period, during which it may have successfully compromised wallets. Users who connected wallets or entered credentials on this domain are advised to immediately transfer assets to a new wallet, revoke any connected dApp permissions, and monitor transaction histories for unauthorized activity. The use of Cloudflare services and the domain’s recent creation date highlight the sophistication of this campaign, underscoring the need for heightened vigilance among digital asset holders.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
piers.ns.cloudflare.comromina.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
df8da84df0f21052e7e6d6f116fef1ab8f02dbcf236865fe7f83645996967d80Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='allocation-firelight.foundation', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
allocation-firelight.foundation
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
1→4
No threat flag
View source4/92 engine detections
View sourceallocation-firelight.foundation
View sourcePD-20260512-E619EA
커뮤니티 구성원 1명이 신고 · 최초 확인 2026년 5월 12일
PD-20260512-E619EA Recipient: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
allocation-firelight.foundation)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.