This domain, zoom-meeting62.online, is currently under investigation for brand impersonation targeting Zoom, a widely used video conferencing platform. The threat type involves credential harvesting through fake login portals designed to mimic legitimate Zoom authentication pages. As of the latest verification, the domain remains active and operational, posing a direct risk to users who may inadvertently disclose sensitive account information. Analysis of the infrastructure reveals the following technical indicators: the domain was registered on July 07, 2026, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and resolves to the IP address 46.202.186.79. The SSL certificate is issued by Let's Encrypt, a common choice for both legitimate and malicious domains due to its accessibility and free provisioning. Despite its active deployment, the domain has not been flagged by any of the 95 vendors on VirusTotal, indicating either recent deployment or effective evasion of automated detection systems. The page title mirrors the domain name, zoom-meeting62.online, which may be used to reinforce the illusion of legitimacy during user interaction. Current risk assessment indicates a moderate-to-high potential for successful exploitation due to the domain's active status, lack of blocklist presence, and targeted impersonation of a trusted brand. Organizations and individuals are advised to block the domain at the network level and update endpoint protection rules to include the IP address 46.202.186.79. Users should be educated to verify the authenticity of Zoom meeting links by inspecting the URL structure and ensuring it originates from the official zoom.us domain. Monitoring for additional domains registered under the same infrastructure or registrar is recommended to identify potential expansion of this phishing campaign.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月7日score 100/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://zoom-meeting62.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprinta390c876c3633004f9d72e00fb2f969834079b99fa0644f78767bc65d85792cbCertificate names · 1 SANs
www.zoom-meeting62.online
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:36 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-07-08 10:16:50 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-07-08 10:16:50 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,021.97hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-19 13:15:52 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.zoom-meeting62.onlineDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
使用技術 · 6 identified
W
WordPress
CMSBlogs
WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of zoom-meeting62.online· checked Jul 7, 2026
97
Good
Performance
FCP
0.99s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
1.42s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
4.49s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
2021.97
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
very_low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='zoom-meeting62.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectio
zoom-meeting62.online
Stored observation history10
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
