ABUSE NOTICE · 72H+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@dynadot.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 4 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
xn--bitrefll-q2a.com is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself as Google, with the page title simply reading "Google". It targets people who trust that brand, and its appearance on crypto-focused blocklists shows it also reaches the crypto community. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-15. As of 2026-10-19 the site is still alive and currently serves a redirect. The readable part of the internationalized domain spells "bitrefll", while the page itself presents as Google.
How the scam works
Impersonation pages like this copy the look of a trusted brand, here Google, so visitors believe they are on a genuine sign-in or verification screen. Victims are pushed to enter account credentials, recovery details or verification codes, which go straight to the operators. A captured Google account can unlock email, saved passwords, cloud files and password resets for exchanges and other services, including crypto accounts. The redirect means visitors may land on the lure page after passing through another address first.
Evidence
On 2026-10-15, VirusTotal showed 14 of 92 engines flagging the domain, including ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data and Gridinsoft. Spamhaus lists it in its domain blocklist as DBL_PHISH. It is blocked by PhishDestroy, MetaMask and SEAL. It also appears in 7 AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-09-11 through DYNADOT LLC, about a month before PhishDestroy detected it. It is hosted at 62.60.226.163 on AS214351 FEMO IT SOLUTIONS LIMITED in Germany. The site uses a TLS certificate from Let's Encrypt (YR1), so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
What to do
If you visited and typed anything, change your Google password right away from Google's own site, sign out all other sessions, and review your recovery email, phone number and two-factor settings for changes you did not make. Turn on a hardware key or authenticator app, and change passwords on any exchange, wallet service or other account that shares that password or resets through that inbox. Watch for unexpected login alerts and forwarding rules in your mailbox. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at DNS, proxy and email gateways, search logs for past visits, and reset credentials for any affected users.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月15日score 100/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://xn--bitrefll-q2a.com/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
Observed page title
Google
Automated brand references
GoogleXbox
TLS証明書
発行者 Let's Encrypt / YR1· stored validity ends in 51 days
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Resolved IP
62.60.226.163
Network ASN
AS15169
Organization
AS214351 FEMO IT SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Observed location
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Server header
gws
ネームサーバー 2
ns1.dyna-ns.net
ns2.dyna-ns.net
Location describes the IP network.
TLS証明書
Issuer
Let's Encrypt / YR1
Valid from
2026-09-11 17:54:28
Valid until
2026-12-10 17:54:27
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Within stored validity dates
Collection time
2026-10-15 16:02:04 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprint93d47433878474f6c3f6d0c45ed0dcc9588cc14d361108c58347bfa20963b855Certificate names · 1 SANs
www.xn--bitrefll-q2a.com
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-19 22:45:30 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:45:30 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.xn--bitrefll-q2a.comDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
