Analysis of xainet888x.online indicates a phishing domain targeting cryptocurrency investors, specifically impersonating the XAINET888X token presale. The domain was registered on February 27, 2026, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and is currently offline as of the report date. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain resolves to IP 84.32.84.161, hosted on AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in Lithuania. Nameservers are configured as ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, a pattern often associated with low-cost or disposable hosting setups.
The page title, 'XAINET888X Token | Official Presale & Early Investor Bonus,' explicitly suggests an attempt to deceive users into participating in a fraudulent token presale. No SSL certificate is present, which is atypical for legitimate financial or investment platforms and increases the risk of credential interception. The domain appears on one security blocklist (PhishDestroy) and was flagged by 2 of 93 security vendors on VirusTotal, though the limited detection rate does not rule out malicious intent. Defenders should treat this domain as a confirmed phishing threat targeting cryptocurrency investors.
The lack of SSL, use of DNS parking nameservers, and association with a known bulletproof hosting provider further support this classification. Network-level blocking of the IP (84.32.84.161) and domain is recommended. Additional monitoring of newly registered domains under the same registrar or hosting provider may help identify related threats. The exact content and functionality of the site remain unanalyzed, but the available indicators align with known presale scam tactics.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:30 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-02-27 19:30:09 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-02-27 19:30:09 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 5,156.75hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-15 05:52:32 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
