VirusTotal
4 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Transfer Trust Wallet”
Trust Walletなりすまし: transfer-bep20.network — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 4/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); URLQuery…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
4 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く2 threat-system alerts
レポートを開くSuspicious
レポートを開くchecked — no match recorded
no community references
レポートを開く14 確認済み — ブロックなし
No threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| YARAhub by abuse.ch | transfer-bep20.network/main.js |
malware | Detects file containing Telegram Bot API |
| DNS4EU | transfer-bep20.network |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain transfer-bep20.network has been assessed with an elevated risk level due to its specific threat type of brand impersonation. This domain poses a significant risk as it attempts to impersonate Trust Wallet, a well-known cryptocurrency wallet, potentially leading to financial loss or credential theft.
Analysis indicates that the domain is flagged by 4 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, suggesting that while not all vendors have identified it as malicious, there is a notable concern. The domain is registered through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and resolves to the IP address 35.157.26.135. It was created on May 13, 2026, and currently appears on 2 security blocklists, including PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer. The Gridinsoft trust score for this domain is 0 out of 100, indicating a complete lack of trustworthiness. The page title found on the domain is 'Transfer Trust Wallet', which is a clear attempt to deceive users into believing they are interacting with a legitimate Trust Wallet service.
To mitigate the risks associated with this brand impersonation threat, users are advised to verify the URL of any Trust Wallet-related pages they visit. If the domain is not trustwallet.com, it should be treated with suspicion. Additionally, implementing DNS-based filtering and using security software that can detect and block such malicious domains can significantly enhance protection. Organizations should also educate their users about the dangers of visiting untrusted websites and encourage them to report any suspicious activities to their security teams.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
dns1.p08.nsone.netdns2.p08.nsone.netdns3.p08.nsone.netdns4.p08.nsone.netLocation describes the IP network.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of transfer-bep20.network · checked Jun 26, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='transfer-bep20.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnecti
transfer-bep20.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
0→4
4/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcetransfer-bep20.network
View sourcePD-20260528-891D0E
保存された類似ドメイン:104 件
104 件中 100 件を表示
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年5月28日
PD-20260528-891D0E Recipient: abuse@hostinger.com Registrar: Hostinger Operations UAB (Lithuania (EU)) Policy Violations: AUP prohibits illegal activity including fraud, phishing, malware hosting; Hostinger may suspend/terminate services and domains Applicable Laws: Lithuanian Criminal Code (Ch. XXX, §§196–198 data/system crimes; §§214–215 electronic fraud); EU Directive 2013/40/EU
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
transfer-bep20.network)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.