VirusTotal
8 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“T-Market ADS”
MetaMaskなりすまし: tmarketads.online — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 8/91 (BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft); Spamhaus…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
8 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
checked — no detections recorded
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
tmarketads.online was an impersonation phishing page that presented itself under the name "T-Market ADS" to win the trust of crypto users. Its listing by MetaMask and SEAL shows it was treated as a threat to wallet holders specifically. PhishDestroy first saw the site on 2026-08-20. It has been offline since 2026-09-08, and as of 2026-10-19 the domain no longer resolves in DNS.
Impersonation pages borrow a familiar or plausible brand, here "T-Market ADS", so visitors assume they are dealing with a real service. The victim is then steered into handing over something valuable. That can be account credentials, a wallet recovery phrase, or a wallet connection and signature that authorises transfers. Once any of these is surrendered, attackers can take over accounts or move funds out of the wallet, and blockchain transfers cannot be reversed.
On 2026-08-26, 8 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. They were BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That count is modest, but the vendors are well established and each reached the verdict on its own. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL with the phishing category, and MetaMask and SEAL both blocklist it alongside PhishDestroy. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses also reference the domain, which shows other researchers tracked it.
The domain was registered through HOSTINGER operations, UAB on 2026-06-19, about two months before PhishDestroy picked it up. That gap suggests it was prepared ahead of an active campaign rather than spun up on the day. It was hosted on the Hostinger International Limited network at 187.127.121.216, geolocated to Malaysia. The site stayed up for roughly three weeks after detection before going dark.
If you connected a wallet to this site or signed anything there, check your token approvals with a revocation tool and cancel any you do not recognise. If you entered a recovery phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and move the remaining assets to a newly created wallet. If you typed a password, change it everywhere you reused it and turn on app-based 2FA. Defenders should keep the domain blocked and search proxy and DNS logs for past lookups of it. Connections to its former hosting address are also worth checking to find exposed users.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
lunar.dns-parking.comsolar.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of tmarketads.online · checked Aug 20, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
4→5
到達可能
8/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePD-20260819-989C97
tmarketads.online
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:79 件
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
tmarketads.online
PD-20260819-989C97 Recipient: abuse@hostinger.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
tmarketads.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.