This domain, telegram.financial, is identified as a brand impersonation threat targeting TRON users through a fraudulent airdrop scheme. The site presents itself as an official TRON promotion, leveraging the Telegram branding in its domain name to deceive users into believing it is a legitimate distribution of tokens. Analysis of the page title, 'TRON AIRDROP,' confirms the intent to exploit trust in the TRON ecosystem, likely aiming to harvest wallet credentials or distribute malicious payloads under the guise of a token giveaway.
Technical evidence supports the classification of this domain as malicious. The domain was registered on February 21, 2026, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and currently resolves to the IP address 104.21.20.197, hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure (AS13335). Security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain with 17 out of 95 detections, indicating a consensus on its malicious nature. Additionally, the domain appears on one security blocklist, and no SSL certificate is present, further reducing its legitimacy. The absence of encryption and the use of a recently created domain align with common phishing tactics.
Users who visited telegram.financial should take immediate action to mitigate potential risks. If any credentials, wallet addresses, or personal information were entered, users must revoke access to any associated wallets or accounts and monitor for unauthorized transactions. It is recommended to scan the device used to access the site for malware, as phishing pages often deploy additional payloads. Users should also report the domain to their security providers and consider updating passwords or recovery phrases for any cryptocurrency wallets that may have been exposed. Vigilance against similar scams is advised, particularly those leveraging high-profile blockchain projects or social media branding.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 20/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttps://telegram.financial/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:14 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-06 23:51:39 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-06 23:51:39 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,240.39hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-04 08:03:17 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='telegram.financial', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
telegram.financial
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
