VirusTotal
17 / 94 engine detections
レポートを開く“Etherfi”
Etherfiなりすまし: s5-ether.finance — 未検証. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 17/94 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar); URLQuery 2 alerts; URLScan…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
17 / 94 engine detections
レポートを開く2 threat-system alerts
レポートを開く3/12
DBL_PHISH
悪意あり
レポートを開くchecked — no match recorded
10 community references
レポートを開くScan report
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagezi Threat Feed | s5-ether.finance |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | s5-ether.finance |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
PhishDestroy identifies s5-ether.finance as an active crypto drainer phishing domain designed to trick users into connecting their wallets and stealing cryptocurrency. This fraudulent site impersonates legitimate DeFi platforms by mimicking their branding and user interfaces, then exploits wallet connections to initiate unauthorized transactions. Users who approve wallet connections risk having their digital assets drained without their consent or additional approval prompts. This domain was flagged for investigation after being blocked by SEAL and MetaMask security systems. PhishDestroy's analysis reveals it was registered on April 02, 2026 through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED with a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate. The domain resolves to IP address 188.114.96.3 and currently shows zero detections out of 95 VirusTotal scans, indicating it has evaded mainstream detection systems despite clear malicious intent. Security researchers have already added this domain to two active blocklists. If you visited s5-ether.finance, immediately disconnect your wallet from the site and revoke any suspicious permissions through your wallet's connection management interface. Transfer any remaining assets to a new wallet address if you suspect compromise. Report the domain to PhishDestroy and your wallet provider, then clear your browser cache and cookies. Never reuse wallet passwords or seed phrases. For additional protection, consider using hardware wallets for large crypto holdings and enable transaction confirmation delays on your wallet settings.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
edna.ns.cloudflare.comkevin.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
af88bd029a45759b041bf315682c414cd4a2890c0e0a7103385df6606cb1e800Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of s5-ether.finance · checked Apr 4, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='s5-ether.finance', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
s5-ether.finance
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
held→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
held→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
held→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
held→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
held→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
held→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
held
registrar_client_hold · NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · client_hold
10 community references
View source17/94 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sources5-ether.finance
View sourcePD-20260404-F2D082
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年4月4日
PD-20260404-F2D082 Recipient: abuse@nicenic.net Registrar: NICENIC International Group Co., Limited (Hong Kong (China)) Policy Violations: “Services may be used only for lawful purposes… fraud, abuse and illegal activity prohibited. Violations may result in immediate suspension.” + dedicated abuse handling and takedown Applicable Laws: Crimes Ordinance Cap.200 (Fraud), Theft Ordinance Cap.210 §16A (fraud by deception), Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance Cap.486
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
s5-ether.finance)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.