rocketbot-latam.digital was registered on February 21, 2026 and remains active as of the report date, July 12, 2026. The site answers over HTTPS with a Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA certificate and returns an HTTP 301 redirect. The authoritative nameservers are ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, indicating the domain is parked on a generic DNS service. Network resolution points to IP address 44.194.186.33, which belongs to AS14618 operated by Amazon.com, Inc. The hosting environment runs Apache HTTP Server and hosts a WordPress installation backed by MySQL and PHP. Additional client‑side libraries observed include Swiper, YouTube embeds, Sendinblue, and Microsoft Advertising scripts. The domain appears on a single security blocklist, PhishDestroy, and received a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 out of 100. The page title retrieved is “Inicio - Rocketbot Software de RPA y automatización de procesos”, and the domain is classified under brand_impersonation targeting the Sui brand. The associated scam type is cryptocurrency, suggesting that malicious actors may be attempting to lure victims into fraudulent crypto transactions while masquerading as a legitimate Sui‑related service. No public analysis of the page content is available, so the exact luring vector and credential‑capture mechanisms remain unknown. Defenders should add 44.194.186.33 and the domain rocketbot-latam.digital to network‑level deny lists and monitor DNS queries for the associated nameservers. Continuous scanning of the IP for changes in HTTP response codes or new content is advised. Given the low trust score and presence on PhishDestroy, security tools should flag any traffic to this domain as suspicious and trigger alerts for potential credential or crypto‑asset theft attempts.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月9日score 63/1001 brand signal
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:13:42 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-09-05 22:16:38 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-09-05 22:16:38 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 593.97hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-09-18 07:15:46 UTC · precision low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 15 identified
W
WordPress
CMS
Open-source CMS powering over 40% of websites worldwide.
Last analyzed First positive detection Previous stored snapshot: 3 detections
alphaMountain.ai
Gridinsoft
サイトパフォーマンス分析
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of rocketbot-latam.digital· checked Mar 7, 2026
37
Poor
Performance
FCP
4.87s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
6.03s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.141
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
675ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
12.19s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
593.97
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
Low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='rocketbot-latam.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnect
rocketbot-latam.digital
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history12
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
