Analysis of phantomcard.online indicates a high‑risk crypto‑drainer operation targeting users of the Phantom wallet. The domain was registered on March 06, 2026 through Hostinger Operations, UAB and resolves to the Amazon‑owned address 35.157.26.135 located in Germany (AS16509). Four nsone.net name servers (dns1.p04.nsone.net through dns4.p04.nsone.net) serve the domain, and no TLS certificate is presented, leaving the site exposed to plain‑HTTP interception. The page title returned from the host, “PHANTOMCARD | Secure Bank Activation”, explicitly references the Phantom brand, confirming impersonation of the legitimate wallet service.
The infrastructure is linked to the Solana Drainer kit, a known malicious script used to exfiltrate cryptocurrency from compromised wallets. VirusTotal scans show that two of ninety‑four security vendors flagged the domain, and three independent blocklists (PhishDestroy, MetaMask, SEAL) have already listed it as malicious. The domain appears on three additional security blocklists, reinforcing the consensus that it is being used for fraudulent activity. Current host status is offline, preventing live content inspection, but the combination of brand impersonation, drainer kit attribution, and multiple detections provides sufficient confidence to treat the domain as a confirmed crypto‑draining threat.
Defenders should add phantomcard.online to DNS and proxy blocklists, monitor traffic to the associated IP address for any residual connections, and enforce strict outbound controls for Solana‑related transactions. Email gateways should flag any messages containing the domain or its URL patterns, and users of the Phantom wallet should be warned not to interact with any activation links originating from this domain. Continuous observation of the IP’s activity within the Amazon network is recommended, as the hosting provider may be leveraged for future campaigns.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 83/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://phantomcard.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:16 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-03-23 22:18:31 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-03-23 22:18:31 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,577.94hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-27 07:16:43 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
あなたの仮想通貨取引所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
