This domain is flagged as a high-risk credential harvesting phishing site targeting users through fraudulent verification pages. Analysis indicates the domain is designed to mimic legitimate authentication portals, likely to capture login credentials, payment details, or personal information under the guise of a required verification process. The page title 'Verificación' suggests a focus on Spanish-speaking users or services, increasing the likelihood of targeted social engineering attacks. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain osogransd.online was registered on June 16, 2026, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB. It currently resolves to the IP address 216.250.112.100 and presents an SSL certificate issued for 'localhost,' a non-standard and suspicious configuration indicative of malicious infrastructure. VirusTotal detection shows 2 out of 95 security vendors have flagged this domain as malicious, a low but notable detection rate that may reflect early-stage or evasive phishing campaigns. No blocklist entries or trust scores from additional threat intelligence platforms were identified at the time of analysis. Mitigation steps for this threat include immediate blocking of the domain and its resolving IP (216.250.112.100) at the network perimeter. Security teams should deploy indicators of compromise (IOCs) across endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems, web proxies, and email security gateways to prevent user access. Given the domain's association with credential harvesting, organizations should monitor for unusual authentication attempts, particularly those originating from internal networks or VPNs. Users who may have interacted with the domain should be required to reset credentials via a trusted channel, and multi-factor authentication (MFA) should be enforced to mitigate account takeover risks. Additionally, security awareness training should emphasize the risks of verification-themed phishing pages, especially those using non-standard SSL certificates or recently registered domains.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:18 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-07-09 10:43:54 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-07-09 10:43:54 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 1,997.52hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-20 01:29:24 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='osogransd.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
osogransd.online
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history12
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
