VirusTotal
6 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“Welcome”
フィッシング: on-atomic.org — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, SOCRadar); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; 2…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
5 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
on-atomic.org is an impersonation phishing page whose name is built to pass as an official Atomic crypto property. It targets cryptocurrency wallet users who arrive expecting a legitimate service. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-13. The site is now dead, offline since 2026-09-20, and its DNS was still inactive at the last check on 2026-10-19.
The page carried only the generic title "Welcome", which does not name a brand, but we classified the site as impersonation because of its branding and the domain itself. Pages like this copy the look of a real wallet or crypto service, then push visitors to "restore", "verify" or "sync" a wallet by typing in a recovery phrase or private key, or to connect a wallet and sign prompts. Anyone who hands over a seed phrase gives the operator full control of the wallet, and the funds are usually swept within minutes.
Six of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-09-21: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That count is modest, so most scanners would not have warned a visitor. The crypto-focused blocklists are stronger evidence: MetaMask and SEAL both list the domain alongside PhishDestroy. Spamhaus also lists it in its domain blocklist under the spam category, and it appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-10 through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu, only three days before PhishDestroy caught it. That short gap is typical of throwaway phishing domains set up for a quick campaign. The site was hosted on the NODE HOST LIMITED network at an address located in Finland. It stayed online for roughly a week before going dark.
If you entered a recovery phrase or private key on this site, treat that wallet as compromised. Create a new wallet with a fresh phrase on a trusted device and move any remaining assets there right away. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, review and revoke token approvals granted during that session. Legitimate wallet providers never ask for your seed phrase on a website. Defenders should keep on-atomic.org blocked at DNS and proxy level and watch for lookalike Atomic-themed domains from the same period.
Last checked
c.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
4→6
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/64632584-2d0b-414a-a44e-bb78de92838b
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
5 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/89 engine detections
View sourceon-atomic.org
View sourceコミュニティ報告:1 件
カテゴリPHISHING
Dear Team, We are writing to report a domain name that is being used to occupy a place in search results under the name of the Atomic Wallet cryptocurrency wallet. A Bing search for this name returns on-atomic[.]org at the head of the list, titled "Atomic Wallet | On-Chain Atom
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
on-atomic.org
“Dear Team, We are writing to report a domain name that is being used to occupy a place in search results under the name of the Atomic Wallet cryptocurrency wallet. A Bing search for this name returns on-atomic[.]org at the head of the list, titled "Atomic Wallet | On-Chain Atomic Swap Multi-Chain Wallet" and described as "A plain-language guide to Atomic Wallet: non-custodial crypto storage, built-in exchange, staking rewards, and 300+ ...". The engine marks the entry as crawled one day earlie”
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
on-atomic.org)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.