nofxtaefa.online has been confirmed as an active high-risk phishing site impersonating Bancolombia’s official online banking portal, Bancolombia Sucursal Virtual Personas. The domain is currently live and distributing malicious content masquerading as the legitimate banking platform. Users are urged to avoid interacting with this domain. nofxtaefa.online was flagged by 7 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors, registered through Tucows.com Co., and resolves to IP address 52.72.49.79. The domain was created on April 11, 2026 and holds a valid Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate. VirusTotal analysis shows this domain is part of an ongoing credential harvesting campaign targeting Spanish-speaking banking users. Despite its recent creation, this domain remains active and dangerous. Users should immediately block nofxtaefa.online via firewall rules and update hosts files if applicable. Bancolombia customers are advised to access their accounts only through the official bancolombia.com domain and enable two-factor authentication. Report any suspicious activity to Bancolombia’s fraud department and local cybercrime units. Monitor financial accounts closely for unauthorized transactions following any potential exposure.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 63/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://nofxtaefa.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprint3dd95889fc4abd1b20a0e3d2122b9f472222d519166dd0347e9fba057b406d09Certificate names · 1 SANs
www.nofxtaefa.online
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:18 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-21 20:04:29 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-21 20:04:29 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,884.17hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-11 18:09:42 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.nofxtaefa.onlineDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
使用技術 · 3 identified
V
Vercel
PaaSCDN
Cloud platform for frontend deployment, optimized for Next.js.
R
React
JavaScript frameworks
JavaScript library for building user interfaces with component-based architecture.
H
HSTS
セキュリティ
HTTP Strict Transport Security — forces browsers to use HTTPS connections only.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of nofxtaefa.online· checked Apr 13, 2026
56
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
7.46s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
12.06s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
53ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
7.84s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
3884.17
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
very_low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='nofxtaefa.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
nofxtaefa.online
Stored observation history10
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CA)
