prodark1.net appeared on the PhishDestroy blocklist on 2026-10-19. The site is currently alive but its content could not be retrieved during the last check on the same day. It was registered on 2026-07-08 and shows no obvious branding, suggesting it may be used to impersonate a cryptocurrency service and target crypto‑wallet owners. PhishDestroy’s first sighting aligns with the domain’s recent registration, indicating a short window before detection.
How the scam works
Although the page title is unavailable, the classification as a suspicious domain implies a typical phishing or wallet‑drainer approach. Victims are lured to a fake interface that asks for private keys, seed phrases, or wallet connection approvals. Once entered, attackers can move funds out of the victim’s wallet or steal credentials for later unauthorized access. The loss is usually the total balance of the compromised wallet.
Evidence
VirusTotal scanned the domain with 92 engines and reported 0 detections, indicating the site itself may not host known malware but still poses a social‑engineering risk. OTX lists three pulses referencing prodark1.net, and PhishDestroy has added it to its blocklist. No other major blocklists or Google Safe Browsing alerts were found at the time of review.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-07-08 through TUCOWS.COM, CO., a common registrar for short‑lived malicious sites. Hosting resolves to IP 104.21.42.97, which belongs to a large content‑delivery network often used to hide the true origin of malicious traffic. The registration‑to‑detection interval of roughly three months suggests a rapid deployment and takedown cycle.
What to do
Anyone who visited prodark1.net should immediately disconnect any linked wallets, revoke all pending approvals, and change passwords on associated accounts. Enable two‑factor authentication wherever possible and monitor blockchain addresses for unexpected activity. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and proxy layers, add it to internal threat intel feeds, and watch for newly registered domains using the same registrar or hosting provider.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-19 23:02:59 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 23:02:59 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.prodark1.netDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
使用技術 · 3 identified
Cloudflare Browser Insights
AnalyticsRUM
Cloudflare Browser Insights is a tool that measures the performance of websites from the perspective of users.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(KN)
