The domain majortrendings.online is an active generic phishing site that does not impersonate a specific brand or deploy a known drainer kit. As of the latest assessment, it remains operational and poses an elevated risk of credential theft or other fraudulent activity. Users searching whether majortrendings.online is safe or a scam should treat it as malicious due to confirmed phishing indicators.
Technical analysis shows that majortrendings.online is flagged by 2 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors, including alphaMountain.ai and Gridinsoft. It appears on 2 security blocklists, specifically PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer, though Google Safe Browsing has not yet flagged it. The domain was registered on 2025-10-25 12:44:10 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and resolves to the IP address 84.32.84.32, hosted by AS47583 Hostinger International Limited in Lithuania. No SSL certificate is present, and the observed page title is 'Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system' with an HTTP 403 status. Nameservers are ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com.
Individuals who may have interacted with majortrendings.online should immediately change any exposed credentials, enable two-factor authentication on affected accounts, and monitor for unauthorized transactions or identity fraud. Victims are advised to report the domain to their email provider, browser security teams, and platforms like the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) or local cybercrime authorities. If financial or cryptocurrency accounts were accessed, contact the respective institution to secure funds and review recent activity for signs of compromise.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 56/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://majortrendings.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:01 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-02-14 16:36:47 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-02-14 16:36:47 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 5,471.64hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-08 16:25:51 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
