ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@whiteprivacy.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 16 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
highnetpro.online presents itself as "Highnet pro", with a homepage titled "Highnet pro- Home". PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page aimed at crypto users who mistake it for a legitimate service. We first flagged it on 2026-10-03. As of 2026-10-19 the domain was still online and serving a redirect, so visitors can still be routed onward to the scam content.
How the scam works
Impersonation pages borrow the name and look of a real or plausible-sounding platform so that visitors trust them with things they would never hand to a stranger. A polished "Home" page like this one is usually the entry point to sign-up or login forms, deposit instructions or support chats that collect credentials, personal details or crypto transfers. The redirect lets operators swap the destination page without changing the domain victims were given. Victims typically lose account access, identity data, or any funds they send in the belief that they are dealing with the genuine brand.
Evidence
Seven of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-07: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue and SOCRadar. That is a modest count, but it comes from vendors working independently of one another. Spamhaus lists the domain on its DBL as a spam domain, and it appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows that other researchers are tracking it as well.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-05-03 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, five months before PhishDestroy detected it. A gap that long suggests the domain was either held in reserve or operated quietly before it drew attention. It resolves to 163.61.188.9, an address on the network of NEW DHAKA HARDWARE, a Bangladeshi provider, with the IP geolocated to the US. Its free Let's Encrypt certificate gives it the browser padlock, which says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
What to do
Do not log in, register or send funds through highnetpro.online or anywhere it redirects you. If you entered a password, change it on any service where you reused it and turn on app-based 2FA. If you deposited crypto, record the transaction details and report them to your exchange and local authorities, and refuse any request for "unlock" or "withdrawal" fees, which only add to the loss. Defenders should block the domain at the DNS and proxy layers, follow its redirect chain to catch the landing pages, and alert users to the "Highnet pro" branding.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月9日score 88/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttps://highnetpro.online/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-19 22:38:33 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:38:33 UTClast content: 2026-10-07 03:00:45 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains4
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
10.highnetpro.onlineDomain record
mail.highnetpro.onlineDomain record
www.10.highnetpro.onlineDomain record
www.highnetpro.onlineDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
