VirusTotal
12 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“Cloudflare Registrar”
Cloudflareなりすまし: grupopgo.com — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 12/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
12 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く5 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
grupopgo.com is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself as "Cloudflare Registrar". It is aimed at people who manage domains and DNS through Cloudflare, including operators of crypto projects, exchanges and wallet front-ends. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-11. When last checked on 2026-10-19, the site was still online and serving its content.
Cloudflare-themed lures usually arrive as an urgent notice about a domain renewal, a transfer, a billing failure or a DNS problem. The link leads to a page styled like the registrar's dashboard that asks the visitor to sign in. Any email, password or one-time code entered there goes to the operators. A captured Cloudflare login can give an attacker control of the victim's domains and DNS. That access lets them redirect a legitimate site, including a crypto project's site, to a drainer or fake login, or intercept its email.
On 2026-09-20, 12 of 89 VirusTotal engines classified the domain as malicious. The flagging vendors include alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data and Gridinsoft. Detection by several independent vendors makes a false positive unlikely, although most engines had not yet caught up. The domain appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers are tracking it, and it is listed on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2023-11-15, almost three years before PhishDestroy detected it. That makes it an aged domain, which tends to pass reputation filters more easily than a fresh registration. It is registered through Cloudflare, Inc. and resolves to Cloudflare's own network in the US, so the fake Cloudflare page is served from genuine Cloudflare infrastructure. Its Google Trust Services certificate is the kind issued automatically to sites behind Cloudflare. The padlock confirms only an encrypted connection, not that the site is legitimate.
If you entered credentials on this page, change your Cloudflare password immediately and sign out all active sessions. Reset or re-enroll two-factor authentication, and use a hardware key if possible. Review your account's audit log, DNS records, nameservers, API tokens, page rules and transfer locks for changes you did not make. Revoke any API tokens you do not recognize. If you reused the password anywhere else, change it there too. Security teams should block the domain and alert staff who handle domain administration. They should also search mail logs for registrar-themed messages that link to it.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
keira.ns.cloudflare.commelnicoff.ns.cloudflare.comroute2.mx.cloudflare.netpriority 19route3.mx.cloudflare.netpriority 43route1.mx.cloudflare.netpriority 75Location describes the IP network.
89605139dde92d4697e0ed421cd65126329f9ee2603afda34da0cfe320f868d9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of grupopgo.com · checked Sep 11, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
grupopgo.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
到達可能
5 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source12/89 engine detections
View sourcegrupopgo.com
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:142 件
142 件中 100 件を表示
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
grupopgo.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.