VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“Everymail | My Account”
フィッシング: everymail-apps.tech — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 7/92 (CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
7 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開くSuspicious
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
everymail-apps.tech posed as the account area of the Everymail email service, with the page title "Everymail | My Account". It targeted Everymail users who could be led to believe they were signing in to manage their mailbox. PhishDestroy first flagged the domain on 2026-10-12. The site is now dead: its DNS stopped resolving, and it has been offline since 2026-10-19.
A fake "My Account" page works by copying the look of a real login portal. Victims usually arrive through a message warning about storage limits, a suspended mailbox or a required security check. Anything typed into the form goes straight to the operators. A stolen email password matters beyond the inbox. Attackers can use it to reset passwords on linked services, including exchange and wallet-related accounts, to read verification codes and to send more phishing to the victim's contacts.
On 2026-10-16, 7 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, SOCRadar, VIPRE and Webroot. That is a modest count, but these are independent vendors with their own detection pipelines, and they reached the same verdict within days of our detection. Among blocklists, the domain appears on PhishDestroy's.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-26 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, only 16 days before PhishDestroy caught it. That short gap fits a disposable domain set up for one campaign. It was hosted on Hostinger International Limited's network in the US. The "apps" label and the .tech extension are meant to sound like an official subdomain or service without belonging to the brand. The site used a free, automatically issued Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about whether it was legitimate.
If you entered your Everymail password on this site, change it immediately from the genuine service. Change it anywhere else you reused it, and turn on two-factor authentication. Review your mailbox for forwarding rules, filters, recovery addresses and active sessions you did not create. Then check accounts that use this email for password resets, especially exchanges and other financial services. Defenders should block the domain, search mail logs for messages linking to it and look for sign-ins from users who may have clicked.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns2.srv2012470.hstgr.cloudeverymail-apps.techpriority 0Location describes the IP network.
f8113dac9959bafd7f5dceaa7846ef1ee8edf5da1c86a70853fd54753972d08aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.everymail-apps.techDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of everymail-apps.tech · checked Oct 12, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
不明→protected
captcha · challenge
No threat flag
View source7/92 engine detections
View sourceeverymail-apps.tech
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
everymail-apps.tech
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
everymail-apps.tech)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.