The domain www.estatex.link was observed to resolve to the IPv4 address 198.54.132.28, which is registered to the autonomous system AS11878 operated by tzulo, inc. in Canada. The domain was registered on June 12, 2025 through Web Commerce Communications Limited and is served by four authoritative name servers (ns1‑ultahost.com through ns4‑ultahost.com). No TLS certificate was presented, indicating that the site was delivered over plain HTTP.
The web page returned a title tag containing the word “home”, but no further content has been captured because the site was taken offline before a full scrape could be performed. VirusTotal records show that five of ninety‑five scanning engines flagged the domain as malicious, consistent with its classification in the intelligence feeds as a “Fake Airdrop” campaign that impersonates Microsoft. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of zero out of one hundred, reinforcing the low reputation of the host. The domain appears on a single external blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service, providing an additional layer of protection for downstream users.
The observed infrastructure suggests a short‑lived phishing operation that leverages brand impersonation to lure victims with a promise of an airdrop, a technique commonly used to harvest credentials or install malware. Because the site is currently offline, real‑time verification of the landing page is not possible, and the exact payload or credential‑collection mechanism remains unknown. Defenders should continue to monitor the IP address 198.54.132.28 for any re‑hosting activity, enforce outbound filtering for connections to the listed name servers, and ensure that corporate web‑proxy and DNS filtering solutions block the domain and its associated IP. Incident response teams that encounter related phishing attempts should treat any communication referencing Microsoft airdrops as suspicious and apply standard credential‑theft mitigation procedures.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 63/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://www.estatex.link/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-7447.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(MY)
