This domain, www.fortrone.com, is flagged as a high-risk brand impersonation threat specifically targeting the Across platform. Analysis indicates the site is designed to deceive users by mimicking legitimate branding, leveraging social engineering tactics to harvest credentials or distribute malicious payloads. The threat type is classified as brand impersonation, a technique commonly employed to exploit trust in established entities for fraudulent purposes.
Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on September 27, 2023, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a registrar frequently associated with malicious activity. It resolves to the IPv6 address 2a02:4780:b:926:0:1fee:cd1c:2, hosted under AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in the United States. The domain lacks an SSL certificate, increasing the risk of interception or manipulation of transmitted data. Detection metrics indicate limited but concerning visibility: VirusTotal reports 3 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious. Additionally, the domain appears on one security blocklist and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, further corroborating its malicious classification. No legitimate use cases or historical benign activity have been identified.
Mitigation measures should prioritize blocking the domain and its associated infrastructure at the network perimeter. Organizations should deploy indicators of compromise (IOCs) such as the domain, IP address, and registrar details into security monitoring systems to detect and prevent access. End-user awareness training is critical to educate personnel on recognizing brand impersonation tactics, particularly those mimicking Across or similar platforms. Given the domain's recent registration and active status, continuous monitoring for related infrastructure (e.g., newly registered domains under the same registrar) is recommended to preemptively disrupt evolving campaigns.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月24日score 10/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://www.fortrone.com/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-616.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by New
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
