Security analysis of www.geminisparklescleanltd.com covers observed phishing indicators, infrastructure evidence, current status, and defensive guidance.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
Analysis of www.geminisparklescleanltd.com shows a newly registered domain (created 27 August 2025) that was used in a brand‑impersonation campaign targeting the brand “across”. The site presented the page title “GEMINI SPARKLES CLEAN LTD” and was classified as a crypto‑scam. Infrastructure details reveal the domain resolves to 35.204.150.5, an address owned by Google LLC (AS396982) located in the Netherlands. DNS is served by OpenProvider name servers (ns1.openprovider.nl, ns2.openprovider.be, ns3.openprovider.eu).
The site employed a Let’s Encrypt R12 certificate, indicating TLS was active at the time of observation. Web‑server technology includes Nginx and the JouwWeb hosting stack, with reCAPTCHA present, suggesting an attempt to evade automated abuse. VirusTotal reports a single positive detection out of 95 scanners, and the domain appears on one external blocklist, specifically PhishDestroy, confirming that at least one security provider has flagged it. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 / 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment.
HTTP response is 404, and the domain is currently taken offline, limiting immediate access to any payload. While the exact phishing page content has not been captured, the combination of brand impersonation, crypto‑scam labeling, low trust score, and blocklist presence provides sufficient evidence for defensive action. Defenders should add the domain and its IP address to block lists, monitor the associated ASN for related activity, and consider tightening email and web filtering rules for “across” brand references. Ongoing observation is advised in case the infrastructure is re‑used under a different domain.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprintc9001c51eb9bc83c68f77e293aa77a082c5fbf524361d6caf85659d2cfb342b1Certificate names · 1 SANs
geminisparklescleanltd.com
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CZ)
