Analysis of www.web3backup.online shows a domain registered on October 03, 2025 through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. The authoritative nameservers are ns1.openprovider.nl, ns2.openprovider.be, and ns3.openprovider.eu, indicating the use of OpenProvider services for DNS. DNS resolution points to IP address 35.204.150.5, which is assigned to Google LLC (AS396982) and geolocated to the Netherlands. The site presented an SSL certificate issued to Webador / by.webador.com, suggesting the use of a low‑cost web‑hosting or site‑builder platform.
An HTTP request returns a 404 status code, and the page title retrieved is simply "web3"; no further content was captured before the domain was taken offline. The domain appears on one security blocklist and is listed as blocked by PhishDestroy. VirusTotal scans recorded four detections out of ninety‑five security vendors, confirming that multiple scanners flag the domain as malicious. The threat classification in the intelligence set is a crypto scam, aligning with the "web3" title and the observed phishing behavior.
While the offline status prevents direct observation of phishing payloads or credential‑harvesting forms, the combination of recent registration, use of reputable hosting infrastructure, a valid TLS certificate, and multiple vendor detections indicates a deliberate attempt to exploit cryptocurrency‑related interest. Defenders should continue to monitor the IP address 35.204.150.5 for any future malicious activity, enforce blocklist updates that include this domain, and consider applying sink‑hole or DNS‑filtering rules for the associated OpenProvider nameservers. Additional scrutiny of any traffic matching the domain's TLS fingerprint or HTTP 404 response pattern is advisable, as threat actors may reactivate the domain or replicate the infrastructure under a new label.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月28日score 98/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://www.web3backup.online/
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-20 10:06:40 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-20 10:06:40 UTClast content: 2026-10-20 10:06:40 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CZ)
