Analysis of the domain cslap.online shows that it was registered on 26 June 2025 through Hostinger operations, UAB. The sole nameserver configuration and a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 / 100 indicate a lack of reputable hosting practices. The site served a page titled “Bot Verification” and did not present an SSL certificate, exposing all traffic to clear‑text interception. DNS resolution points to IP 92.113.16.39, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited and is geolocated in Germany.
The IP address is listed on two external security blocklists, and the domain itself has been captured by the PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer blocklists. VirusTotal analysis recorded detections from two of ninety‑five scanners, confirming malicious intent despite the low overall detection ratio. The domain is currently offline, which limits immediate observation of HTTP response codes or content beyond the recorded page title. No additional indicators such as phishing kits, targeted brands, or credential‑harvesting URLs have been published.
Given the combination of a recent registration, zero trust score, lack of TLS, and multiple independent blocklist entries, the infrastructure is consistent with a generic phishing operation. Defenders should add cslap.online and its resolving IP 92.113.16.39 to network‑level deny lists, monitor for any re‑activation, and consider extending existing URL filtering policies to cover the associated blocklists. Continuous re‑assessment is advised should the site become active again or if further threat‑intel sources publish new artifacts.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:16 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-17 16:27:16 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-17 16:27:16 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,519.79hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-09 04:21:05 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cslap.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("S
cslap.online
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
