VirusTotal
5 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く“Assistência para Clientes Movida”
ブロックリスト掲載ドメイン: consultingmovida.online — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 5/90 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar, VIPRE)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
5 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く1 threat-system alert
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く80/100
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | consultingmovida.online |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
consultingmovida.online is on the PhishDestroy blocklist. It presented itself under the Portuguese title "Assistência para Clientes Movida" (Movida customer assistance), so it borrowed the Movida brand and aimed at Portuguese-speaking customers looking for help. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-08-24. The site has been offline since 2026-09-11, and its DNS was still inactive at the last check on 2026-10-19.
A support page on an unofficial domain that combines "consulting" with a company name is a common lure. People searching for help with a booking, a charge or an account can land there and believe they are dealing with the real company. The risk on pages like this is that visitors hand over personal details, login credentials or payment information to whoever runs the domain. Some are also pushed into paying "fees" or contacting fake agents. PhishDestroy has not assigned this domain a specific scheme type, but presenting the Movida name on an unrelated domain is the core warning sign.
On 2026-09-04, VirusTotal showed 5 of 90 engines flagging the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a low count, but five unrelated vendors converging on a days-old domain is meaningful. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers had already tracked it. Among blocklists, it is listed by PhishDestroy.
The domain was registered through HOSTINGER operations, UAB on 2026-08-19, five days before PhishDestroy picked it up. That short gap fits a site built to be used quickly rather than a long-standing business presence. It resolved to 84.32.84.85 on a network located in Cyprus. About three weeks after first detection, it went dark.
If you entered a password on this site, change it on the real Movida account and anywhere else you reuse it, and turn on two-factor authentication where available. If you gave card or bank details or paid anything, contact your bank right away to block the card and dispute the charges. Reach Movida only through contact details you find yourself, not through links or phone numbers from this page. Watch for follow-up calls, messages or emails that cite your booking, since harvested data is often reused for further fraud. Defenders should block the domain, check logs for past visits or form submissions to it, and watch for similar Movida-themed lookalike domains.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
atlas.dns-parking.comhyperion.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of consultingmovida.online · checked Aug 24, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
consultingmovida.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
0→4
5/90 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePD-20260824-9A08E7
Page captured
View sourceconsultingmovida.online
View sourcePD-20260824-9A08E7 Recipient: report@abuseradar.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
consultingmovida.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.