Analysis as of July 24, 2026 indicates that the domain capitalprimeplc.com.standardfirm.online was registered on September 27, 2025 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB. The domain resolves to the IPv4 address 198.12.93.82, which belongs to AS36352 operated by HostPapa and is geolocated to the United States. Nameserver records point to ns1.megatronserver.com and ns2.megatronserver.com. No TLS certificate was observed, meaning the site was served over HTTP only.
The page title returned by the server is “capitalprimeplc”, providing no additional context about the malicious payload. Google Safe Browsing classifies the URL as a social‑engineering threat, and VirusTotal reports that three of ninety‑five scanned security vendors flagged the domain, indicating a low but non‑zero detection rate. The domain appears on a single external blocklist and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy sinkhole, confirming that at least one defensive network has taken mitigation steps. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, reinforcing the perception of high risk.
The site is currently taken offline, which limits immediate exposure but does not guarantee that the infrastructure will not be re‑used. Uncertainty remains regarding the specific phishing kit, the exact content served, and whether additional infrastructure such as command‑and‑control servers is shared with other campaigns. Defenders should add the IP address 198.12.93.82 and the full domain name to inbound and outbound filtering rules, monitor for any resurgence of the domain or its aliases, and ensure that alerts from Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, or blocklist feeds are correlated with this indicator. Continuous observation of the registrar HOSTINGER operations, UAB for future registrations that mimic the same naming pattern is also advised.
For the registrable domain standardfirm.online behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:02 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-17 22:20:02 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-17 22:20:02 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,513.91hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-09 07:17:28 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
