On July 22, 2026, analysis was performed for the domain caila.website. The site is presently offline, returning no HTTP content and lacking an SSL certificate, which eliminates encrypted traffic inspection. The domain was registered on July 11, 2025 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB and resolves to the IPv6 address 2a02:4780:84:9a66:7091:c583:ce3d:a198, hosted in Japan under ASN 47583 (Hostinger International Limited). The page title observed during the brief availability window was “Caila Official”, and the domain is classified as a crypto scam that impersonates the Telegram brand.
Security telemetry shows that one of ninety‑five VirusTotal scanners flagged the domain, indicating at least one vendor detected malicious behavior. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, and the domain appears on four independent blocklists (PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Codeesura), confirming its reputation as a malicious resource. The malicious payload is identified as the Angel Drainer kit, a known cryptocurrency‑draining framework. The combination of a dedicated drainer kit, brand impersonation, and low trust scores suggests the domain was used to lure Telegram users into transferring cryptocurrency to attacker‑controlled wallets.
No further evidence such as phishing pages, credential harvesters, or additional infrastructure has been publicly disclosed, leaving the exact delivery method uncertain. Defenders should continue to block the IPv6 address and the domain at perimeter filters, update threat‑intel feeds with the observed indicators, and monitor for any re‑registration attempts or variations that reuse the Angel Drainer kit. Users of Telegram should be warned that any unsolicited requests referencing caila.website are likely fraudulent and should be ignored.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
0 wallet · 2 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 15/1001 brand signal
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年8月3日0 wallet · 2 Telegram IoCs
Submitted URLhttps://caila.website/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:12:08 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-19 16:19:47 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-19 16:19:47 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,471.92hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-10 04:17:21 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='caila.website', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
caila.website
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
あなたの仮想通貨取引所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
