VirusTotal
15 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“Big Bet A Win”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is domainabuse@tucows.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 12 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
フィッシング: bigbetawin.com — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 15/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET); URLScan malicious verdict…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
15 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開くScan report
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
bigbetawin.com presents itself as "Big Bet A Win", a betting-themed site aimed at people gambling or investing with cryptocurrency. PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page and first flagged it on 2026-10-08. The site was still up and serving its content when we last checked on 2026-10-19, so anyone landing on it today faces an active scam.
Sites like "Big Bet A Win" copy the look of a legitimate gaming or crypto platform so visitors trust it with logins and deposits. Victims are usually asked to register, sometimes handing over email and password, and then fund an account in crypto. Balances and "winnings" shown on screen are fabricated. When the user tries to cash out, the site invents taxes, verification charges or minimum-turnover rules to extract more money, and the original deposit is never returned. Crypto transfers can't be reversed, so every payment sent is effectively lost.
Fifteen of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-12, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and CyRadar. That spread across well-established vendors makes this hard to dismiss as a single false positive. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and tagged the page as a crypto scam. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses and is listed on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-11 through TUCOWS.COM, CO., roughly five months before PhishDestroy caught it. That gap suggests it may have been held in reserve or run quietly before drawing attention. Traffic is routed through Cloudflare in the US, which hides the real server behind a shared proxy address. Takedown requests therefore need to go to the proxy and the registrar rather than an identifiable host.
If you signed up, stop sending money immediately and ignore any demand to pay a fee, tax or deposit before a "withdrawal". No legitimate platform charges extra to release your own balance. If you reused the password you entered there, change it everywhere it was used and turn on two-factor authentication. Keep transaction hashes and screenshots for a police or fraud report, and treat anyone offering to "recover" your funds for a fee as a second scam. Security teams should block bigbetawin.com at DNS and proxy level and search logs for users who visited or submitted forms.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
garret.ns.cloudflare.comoaklyn.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
1d88868de51398a0d6e8d4b7becfa4a79a970a921c307812ce0b04df7559ca81Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of bigbetawin.com · checked Oct 8, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
不明→live_content
content_served
到達可能
No threat flag
View source15/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261008-F979FB
Page captured
View sourcebigbetawin.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
bigbetawin.com
PD-20261008-F979FB Recipient: domainabuse@tucows.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
bigbetawin.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.