PhishDestroy has identified an active generic phishing domain named basics-wordprompt.online that is masquerading as a legitimate writing-prompt service while serving malicious JavaScript designed to steal cryptocurrency and sensitive credentials. The domain exhibits red-flag behaviors consistent with modern drainer kits, including dynamic content loading and rapid redirection chains, which are designed to evade traditional security layers. No overt brand impersonation has been confirmed at this stage, suggesting the operators are leveraging a self-contained lure rather than hijacking a well-known brand identity. This domain was flagged by PhishDestroy on receipt of telemetry indicating active distribution of a cryptocurrency-draining payload. Technical indicators include a VirusTotal detection score of 4/95 at time of analysis, registration through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, resolution to IP 88.223.84.140, and issuance of a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate. The domain was created on May 07, 2026, and currently shows no presence on Google Safe Browsing lists or any of the major public blocklists queried, indicating a very recent launch window and minimal historical abuse signaling. The absence of detections on VirusTotal underscores the importance of behavioral monitoring and sandbox analysis when evaluating newly observed domains. As of this report, basics-wordprompt.online remains active and continues to resolve to its assigned infrastructure. PhishDestroy has escalated the domain to Tier-2 abuse desks at HOSTINGER and Let’s Encrypt for takedown, and has shared IOCs with leading threat-intelligence platforms to accelerate propagation across security vendor ecosystems. The current risk level is classified as under_investigation to reflect the ongoing verification of payload hashes and C2 endpoints, but users should treat any interaction with this domain as hostile until definitive remediation is confirmed. Users who may have entered credentials or connected wallets while on this domain are urged to revoke permissions immediately via their wallet’s dApp browser or settings panel and to monitor for anomalous transactions.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprint097e4e82fdbff97c2008e4a0be4ee59efbe5d1f38df65df584c4be899535142dCertificate names · 1 SANs
www.basics-wordprompt.online
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:11:38 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-13 22:36:16 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-13 22:36:16 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,609.64hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-07 07:25:35 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.basics-wordprompt.onlineDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of basics-wordprompt.online· checked May 28, 2026
60
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
6.92s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
6.92s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
6.92s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
2609.64
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
very_low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='basics-wordprompt.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnec
basics-wordprompt.online
Stored observation history12
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
