Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
セキュリティシグナル
Scamadviser Warnings21/100
The identity of the owner of the website is hidden on WHOIS The Tranco rank (how much traffic) is rather low An iframe has been detected within the website Cryptocurrency services detected, these can be high risk The age of this site is (very) young. The main site has a lower ranking
We found a valid SSL certificate DNSFilter labels this site as safe
The domain airdrop.bitcoinexchange.finance was registered on February 21, 2026 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB and is currently resolved to the IP address 62.72.49.50, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited and is geolocated in the United States. The authoritative nameservers are ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, indicating a typical parking configuration often used by malicious operators. The web server presents LiteSpeed under a Hostinger hosting environment and supports HTTP/3, while the TLS certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt (R13) and therefore appears valid but does not mitigate the underlying abuse. The page title returned by the site is "Airdrop", and the observed scam type is classified as a Crypto Scam employing the publicly identified "Airdrop Scam" phishing kit.
The branding target is Bitcoin, suggesting an attempt to lure victims with a false promise of a Bitcoin airdrop. Reputation services flag the domain as highly untrustworthy: Scamadviser assigns a trust score of 21 out of 100, Gridinsoft scores it at 0 out of 100, and the domain is listed on at least one security blocklist. VirusTotal analysis shows that one out of ninety‑five scanned security vendors flagged the domain, and PhishDestroy has already blocked it.
These data points collectively indicate an active brand‑impersonation infrastructure that is likely being used to harvest cryptocurrency credentials or funds. Defenders should block the domain and its resolving IP at perimeter defenses, monitor for related DNS queries, and add the indicator to threat‑intel feeds. Ongoing observation of the hosting provider’s IP range is advisable, as the same AS may host additional malicious assets.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
1 wallet · 0 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
For the registrable domain bitcoinexchange.finance behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:11:08 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-07-09 10:28:07 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-07-09 10:28:07 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 1,997.78hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-20 01:21:31 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 3 identified
L
LiteSpeed
Web servers
High-performance web server compatible with Apache configurations.
H
Hostinger
H
HTTP/3
Miscellaneous
Third major version of HTTP protocol, built on QUIC for faster, more reliable connections.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='airdrop.bitcoinexchange.finance', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
airdrop.bitcoinexchange.finance
Stored observation history12
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
