The domain accesszoom.online was registered on February 27, 2026 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB and is hosted on Hostinger’s DNS parking service (ns1.dns-parking.com, ns2.dns-parking.com). DNS resolution points to the IP address 2.57.91.91, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited and is geolocated in Cyprus. No TLS certificate is presented for the host, indicating the site was served over plain HTTP. The HTTP response returned the page title "Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system," confirming that the domain was not serving any active phishing content at the time of analysis.
VirusTotal records show that one out of ninety‑three security vendors flagged the domain, and the host appears on three external blocklists. The domain has been taken offline, and active blocklist entries from PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL indicate that it was previously identified as a phishing vector. The risk level is marked as elevated, reflecting the combination of recent creation, hosting on a widely used provider, and the single vendor detection.
Defenders should continue to block the domain at perimeter defenses, monitor for any resurrection of the host on the same IP range, and enforce strict outbound filtering for traffic to Hostinger DNS parking IPs. Because the site currently returns a parked page and lacks SSL, the immediate threat surface is low, but the recent registration and prior flagging suggest the domain could be repurposed for future phishing campaigns. Continuous re‑evaluation of the domain’s status and correlation with threat‑intel feeds is recommended to ensure timely detection if the domain becomes active again.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 56/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://accesszoom.online/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:07:43 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinecurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCfirst terminal observation: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
