VirusTotal
7 / 91
SignalerInterpretation & limits
Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
sparkles.network — Masqué · accessible (HTTP 403). Type d'arnaque : Impersonation. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 7/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); cloaking observed; PhishDestroy score 100/100. Bureau d’enregistrement: Cloudflare.
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
7 / 91
SignalerEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
23 community references
SignalerCommunity publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
provider verdict: clean
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
rapport stocké
Signaler A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
Analyse terminée
SignalerThis is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
SignalerA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates.
This domain operates a credential phishing campaign designed to capture user login information through a convincing replica interface. The site leverages Cloudflare infrastructure for hosting and DDoS protection, complicating takedown efforts. With only 2 detections across 91 VirusTotal engines and minimal blocklist coverage, the threat remains significantly under-reported. Organizations should immediately block the domain at DNS and proxy layers, monitor for related infrastructure sharing the same nameservers, and submit samples to additional threat intelligence feeds to improve community detection coverage.
La page renvoyait une réponse à un visiteur utilisant un navigateur et une autre à un robot d'indexation ou à un scanner de sécurité. Le « cloaking » n'a pour seul but que d'empêcher les évaluateurs d'accéder à la véritable page de destination.
status_splitcloudflareNote relative à la numérisation: cloudflare_challenge: raw=cf_challenge; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
La réputation Edge-IP n’est pas attribuée à ce domaine.
lovisa.ns.cloudflare.comnoel.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
7e64313b340d0cbce77b7230a46ca46c16282908a975d2047a2f5f5c5c1e13fdSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
13 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Signalé par 1 membre de la communauté ; première observation le 26/11/2025
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif