VirusTotal
2 / 91
“Digital Asset Information Platform - Structured Data Access Tools”
Analysis dated July 24 2026 identifies www.lighters-dex.cam as an active brand‑impersonation infrastructure targeting the generic “across” brand.
The detailed PhishDestroy AI analysis below remains in English to preserve the original forensic record.
Analysis dated July 24 2026 identifies www.lighters-dex.cam as an active brand‑impersonation infrastructure targeting the generic “across” brand. The domain was registered on February 21 2026 through Global Domain Group LLC and is hosted on a Hetzner Online GmbH server (AS24940) located in Finland, reachable at 65.21.174.205. DNS resolution points to authoritative nameservers ns41.link-host.net and ns42.link-host.net. The web service presents a 403 HTTP response and advertises a Let's Encrypt R12 certificate, indicating TLS encryption is in place. The page title “Digital Asset Information Platform – Structured Data Access Tools” suggests a fabricated data‑service front‑end, though no further content analysis is available.
Technology fingerprinting reveals Nginx as the web server and the presence of Liveinternet analytics scripts. Reputation checks show the domain is listed on one public security blocklist and has been blocked by the PhishDestroy filtering service. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment. VirusTotal scans report that 2 of 93 scanning engines have flagged the domain, confirming a low but non‑zero detection rate.
The combination of a newly created domain, low trust score, blocklist presence, and partial VirusTotal detections meets the criteria for a high‑risk classification. Defenders should add 65.21.174.205 and the associated nameservers to deny‑list rules, enforce HTTPS inspection for the Let's Encrypt certificate, and monitor for any traffic to www.lighters-dex.cam. Because the site returns a 403 status, active probing may be limited, but the infrastructure can be leveraged for credential harvesting or malicious redirects. Continuous observation of the host and rapid propagation of blocklist entries are recommended to mitigate potential abuse.
Stored crawler-versus-browser observations for this host, plus a live fingerprint check for Keitaro-style traffic distribution systems.
Scanner note: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-49611.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by N
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns42.link-host.netLocation describes the IP network.
baccff9ec895af0fe57315391ab5411f4728da0ac17f8d6dfdf65e9d49fe6008lighters-dex.camSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-49611.invalid · checked Apr 29, 2026
12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowSubmit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportRecent phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorMonitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive