Skip to security report
Analytics Dashboard
Domain security report
delivery-claim.cfd favicon

delivery-claim.cfd

“delivery-claim.cfd”

Threat verdict
CriticalDomain Appeal
Assessment sources

Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →

Availability Last known active Latest stored reachability observation Observed · HTTP probe
Risk signals
VirusTotal detections: 7/89 Spamhaus DBL: DBL_PHISH Stored blocklist matches: 2 Automated brand label: MetaMask
OTX: 4 refs Sep 11, 2026 MetaMask 1 Report Sent
API
Registrar
Web Commerce Communica…
Resolved IP
103.224.182.189
Registered
Sep 8, 2025
4 sources
The capture source is temporarily unavailable.
1 / 4
Source
Primary capture
Collected · UTC
Open capture
Stored TLS certificateHostname mismatchReview certificate names and collection time
In this reportGet help
This domain has been flagged as malicious
Security engines reporting a detection: 7. Public blocklists reporting a match: 2. Exercise extreme caution — do not enter credentials or personal information.
ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence

The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at . The recorded recipient is abuse@trellian.com. The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.

ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.

Elapsed since first report
1 month
Reports sent
1
Latest case ID
PD-20260911-2FC59B
Current status
HTTP 200 at latest stored check

Additional indicators at a glance

Spamhaus DBL
DBL_PHISH
VirusTotal
VirusTotal
7 det.
OTX references
4 community refs
URLScan
URLScan
Report ↗
TLS Certificate
Hostname mismatch
Let's Encrypt / YE2 · Certificate hostname mismatch
Age
1.1 yr
Observed status
Last known active 200
PhishDestroy
DestroyList
Listed
Reports Sent
1

Source evidence

9 · sources

These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.

VirusTotal

7 / 89

Report
Interpretation & limits

Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.

Public blocklists

2 external matches

Details
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Spamhaus DBL

DBL_PHISH

Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

URLQuery

checked — no detections recorded

Report
Interpretation & limits

Alerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.

OTX

4 community references

Report
Interpretation & limits

Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.

CF Radar

provider verdict: clean

Observation time not recorded
Report
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

URLScan capture

stored report

View stored capture ↗
Report
Interpretation & limits

A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.

URLScan verdict

Analysis completed

Report
Interpretation & limits

This is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.

Google Safe Browsing

Checked; no threat flag recorded

Report
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Evidence Summary

Critical
VirusTotal
7/89
OTX
4 community refs
URLScan
Stored capture

AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.

Assessment

Stored evidence for delivery-claim.cfd: VirusTotal recorded 1 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-11. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for delivery-claim.cfd. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.

Detection Evidence

VirusTotal records 1 detections among 89 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-11. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-11 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.

Source Context

MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for delivery-claim.cfd in the snapshot dated 2026-09-11. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains delivery-claim.cfd as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.

Reachability and Timeline

The record first observed delivery-claim.cfd on 2026-09-11. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-11 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2025-09-08. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-09-11 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.

Registration and Infrastructure

The source stores 103.224.182.189 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for delivery-claim.cfd is recorded as 2025-09-08. The observed server header is recorded as Apache in this record. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.

Conclusion

The delivery-claim.cfd record states that VirusTotal recorded 1 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-11. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-11. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. The observed address field in this record contains 103.224.182.189. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for delivery-claim.cfd. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.

Recommended Actions

Avoid submitting sensitive information to delivery-claim.cfd during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain delivery-claim.cfd as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to delivery-claim.cfd. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 103.224.182.189 or to other infrastructure records.

Data coverage & collection

22 · datasets with records / 9 · not recorded

What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.

Recorded dataPartial recordUTC
VirusTotal
7 / 89 · engine detections
URLScan analysis
Automated verdict retained
URLQuery
Stored source record
Google Safe Browsing
Checked; no threat flag recorded
OTX publications
4 · community references
External blocklists
2 · external matches
Cloudflare Radar
cleanCollection time not recorded
Spamhaus DBL
DBL_PHISH
Domain registration
Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.ccCollection time not recorded
Network & DNS
103.224.182.189 · 3 · nameserversCollection time not recorded
TLS certificate
Let's Encrypt / YE2
Page captures
4 · retained captures
Page analysis
1 · automated brand labels
Observed indicators
0 · wallet / Telegram indicators
Detection & evasion
Stored browser and crawler comparison
PageSpeed performance
89/100 · mobile performance
Response records
1 · outgoing report records
Availability history
24 · stored state changes
Source observation history
5 · stored source events
Lookalike relationships
79 · retained relationshipsCollection time not recorded
IP reputation
Network-level observations
Wayback archive
Archive link retained
Not recorded in this report 9

These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.

  • PhishStats
  • DNS security filters
  • Gridinsoft
  • Scamadviser
  • HTML archives
  • Site configuration files
  • Recorded subdomains
  • Community reports
  • Chainabuse records
Download the dated observations and supporting metadata.

Blocklist records

2 · external source matches

Public Blocklist Status

Domain, network & archive

Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc · 103.224.182.189 · DNS, TLS and retained responses

Domain details

Domain
URLScan verdict Analysis completed score 0 report ↗
IP Reputation abuse score 8/100 5 reports PhishingBad Web BotWeb App Attack checked Oct 11, 2026
OTX tags 2026-09activeall-domainsblocklistcontentcryptodomainsdrainerfraudlivemonthlyphishdestroyphishingscam
Registrar Web Commerce Communica… (Unknown)
Abuse contactabuse@trellian.com
ICANN RegistryICANN Lookup (RDAP) →
WHOIS LookupICANN RDAP for delivery-claim.cfd →
RegistrationCreated Sep 8, 2025 — Expires Sep 8, 2027
HTTP Status200
Technical detailsProvenance & timestamps
First DetectedSep 11, 2026
DOM Analysisanalyzed Sep 11, 2026score 95/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://delivery-claim.cfd/
Favicon Hash
Case ID
SHORTDOT ZONE · PUBLIC EVIDENCE .cfd

ShortDot zone evidence

The linked repository preserves daily zone observations across seven ShortDot-operated TLDs, including registration volume and abuse-related indicators. This registry context is supporting background and is not an independent detection for the domain in this report.

ShortDot SA · Luxembourg 7 zones · full-zone evidence updated daily Open the ShortDot evidence repository
ICANN OVERSIGHT

Accreditation and RAA context
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations

For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.

Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.

RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.

Accreditation is a contract, not a safety seal. Verify ICANN fees Read RAA §3.18 PHISHDESTROY INVESTIGATIONICANN funding, contracts, and DNS abuse oversight
Accountability draft Nothing is sent automatically.

Network & certificates

Stored technical evidence

Network & DNS

Resolved IP
103.224.182.189
Network ASN
AS133618
Organization
TRELLIAN-AS-AP - Trellian Pty. Limited, AU
Observed location
San Diego, US
Server header
Apache
Nameservers 3
  • ns100.webnic.cc
  • ns101.webnic.cc
  • synth-ip-c0a86410.delivery-claim.cfd

Location describes the IP network.

TLS certificate

Issuer
Let's Encrypt / YE2
Valid from
2026-09-09 00:22:18
Valid until
2026-12-08 00:22:17
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Within stored validity dates
Collection time
2026-10-09 13:03:28 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprint5f14158203e2ea4193c49ed972e8acfc9c38f8ce8eb36cae72726af38baf4e62
Certificate names · 61 SANs
  • dallversid.sbs
  • dandeslembangmarinding.site
  • deepundergroundevents.com
  • desktops-user-app.com
  • desktops-users-apps.com
  • desportopg.co
  • dgswora33.cfd
  • diroesteticapop.shop
  • dodoexl.io
  • dopdii5000.icu
  • dreqpayord.com
  • dronenation.online
  • ecosalutepop.shop
  • elqoriva.world
  • fanpages-advertisiessubmit.my.id
  • fecondation.org
  • fenobea.com
  • fffsd9ug.top
  • ffpal.cn
  • ffssp.vip
  • fggijklmm.xyz
  • fghiijkmn.xyz
  • fghikklmn.xyz
  • fgijkllmn.xyz
  • fhxy-j-jvtckjk.top
  • fhxy-s-bjtnfii.top
  • fhxy-s-nkmdjfa.cc
  • fhxy-s-ponobtg.top
  • fhxy-s-tjnogvq.top
  • fhxy-s-whktoxd.cc
  • fiberglass-pools.shop
  • fideltylocaltext.sbs
  • figashoppop.shop
  • filgistoreitpop.shop
  • financialdefault.cc
  • financialdesert.info
  • financialdis.cc
  • financialdisaster.info
  • findintuitresearch.digital
  • findwithfortislawpartnerssales.one
  • firmfoundationng.org
  • firstcharitydao.club
  • flexdriveode.com
  • gb73.cc
  • www.dallversid.sbs
  • www.dandeslembangmarinding.site
  • www.deepundergroundevents.com
  • www.delivery-claim.cfd
  • www.desktops-user-app.com
  • www.desktops-users-apps.com
  • www.dgswora33.cfd
  • www.diroesteticapop.shop
  • www.dodoexl.io
  • www.dopdii5000.icu
  • www.dreqpayord.com
  • www.dronenation.online
  • www.ecosalutepop.shop
  • www.elqoriva.world
  • www.fanpages-advertisiessubmit.my.id
  • www.figashoppop.shop
  • www.filgistoreitpop.shop

Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.

viewdns.info · 103.224.182.189rapiddns.io

Latest Classified Outcome 2026-10-16 10:06:28 UTC

Primary outcome Live content reason: Ordinary HTTP content served 90% confidence
Attribution source: Current Http Probe
Evidence layers Availability: Content serving Content: Content served at root DNS: Resolved Registration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation Live content Ordinary HTTP content served 90% 2026-10-16 10:06:28 UTC
RDAP registration Unknown
Observed timeline last reachable: 2026-10-16 10:06:28 UTC last content: 2026-10-16 10:06:28 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Technologies · 1 identified
Detected via Cloudflare Radar · Wappalyzer engine
Report This Domain Submit evidence & help protect others

VirusTotal Analysis

7 / 89 security vendors flagged this domain
View on VT
Last analyzed Previous stored snapshot: 1 detection
alphaMountain.ai
CRDF
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
Fortinet
Gridinsoft
LevelBlue
SOCRadar

Archived Evidence

Wayback Machine Snapshot
A historical snapshot is available for evidence review
View Archive
Site Performance Analysis

Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of delivery-claim.cfd · checked Sep 11, 2026

89
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
1.18s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
2.78s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.145
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
55ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
2.92s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good 50-89 Needs Work 0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details3

Availability observations

Last reachable observation
Last content observation
Estimate basis
Currently reachable

An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.

Detection & evasion checks

Stored browser and crawler observations

Detection-evasion analysis

Cloaking and traffic-distribution check

Not yet scanned No crawler-versus-browser difference has been recorded yet

Stored crawler-versus-browser observations for this host, plus a live fingerprint check for Keitaro-style traffic distribution systems.

Stored cloaking flag
Not yet scanned
Last cloaking scan
Server header seen by scanner
Apache

Scanner note: alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=Apache

Live TDS fingerprint check
Seven Keitaro fingerprints and a browser-versus-crawler comparison. A new scan starts only when you press the button.
Saved result
Unreachable

Timeline & response

1 · outbound report records

Forensic History & Detection Timeline

ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
  1. Domain Status Transition 2026-10-09 01:46:13 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain state transitioned from dead to alive.
  2. Domain Status Transition 2026-09-29 10:06:09 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain state transitioned from alive to dead.
  3. Domain Status Transition 2026-09-29 01:28:24 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain state transitioned from dead to alive.
  4. Domain Status Transition 2026-09-17 02:18:29 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain state transitioned from alive to dead.
  5. Threat First Observed 2026-09-11 03:28:52 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 103.224.182.189.
Stored observation history29

Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.

  1. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  2. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  3. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  4. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  5. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→redirected

    http_redirect

Earlier observations 24
  1. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  2. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  3. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  4. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  5. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  6. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  7. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→redirected

    http_redirect

  8. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  9. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  10. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  11. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    live_content→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  12. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→live_content

    content_served

  13. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unavailable→Reachable

  14. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  15. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→inactive

    parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page

  16. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  17. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→inactive

    parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page

  18. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  19. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→inactive

    parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page

  20. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  21. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Reachable→Unavailable

  22. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unavailable→Reachable

  23. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Reachable→Unavailable

  24. Availability monitor · First collection record

    Reachable

Threat Response Pipeline

Discovery
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring

17 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.

Threat Ingested
delivery-claim.cfd detected and queued for full analysis
Sep 11, 2026
Spamhaus DBL
Spamhaus DBL recorded DBL_PHISH
Oct 11, 2026
URLScan.io Capture
Stored URLScan report with capture artifacts
Sep 11, 2026
Cloudflare Radar Report
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
Web Archive
Preserved in Wayback Machine — historical evidence archived
Sep 23, 2026
VirusTotal
7/89 recorded on VirusTotal
Sep 13, 2026
Blocklist Detection
Found in 2 blocklists: MetaMask, SEAL
Oct 16, 2026
OTX Community References
4 community publication references on AlienVault OTX. References are not vendor verdicts and are excluded from the evidence score.
Oct 11, 2026
Brand Impersonation
Impersonation of MetaMask
Forensic Evidence Collected
Stored evidence from URLScan.io, URLQuery, stored screenshot
Sep 11, 2026
Technical Analysis Recorded
The report contains stored technology or forensic-analysis results.
Oct 16, 2026
Site Came Back Online
Domain is responding again — monitoring resumed
Oct 9, 2026
Content Observed Unavailable
Monitoring recorded an unavailable response (HTTP 200); the cause was not independently established.
Sep 29, 2026
Site Came Back Online
Domain is responding again — monitoring resumed
Sep 29, 2026
Content Observed Unavailable
Monitoring recorded an unavailable response (HTTP 200); the cause was not independently established.
Sep 17, 2026
Sent Report Recorded
Stored outgoing record associated with registrar Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc, 1 abuse contact
abuse@trellian.com
Sep 11, 2026
DestroyList Published
Listed in the public PhishDestroy/DestroyList repository
Sep 11, 2026
Monitoring Continues
The domain remains reachable or access-restricted; future checks may update this observation.
How we investigate & report

Public scans, evidence and abuse channels

We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.

01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups
urlscan.io Screenshot · DOM · HTTP

Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.

VirusTotal Multi-engine verdicts

Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.

Cloudflare Radar DNS · certificates · categories

Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.

AlienVault OTX Threat-intelligence pulses

Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.

Wayback Machine Historical evidence

Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.

crt.sh Certificate Transparency

Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.

DNS Security Filters Quad9 · AdGuard · CleanBrowsing

Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.

Web-Check Surface inspection

Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.

02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels
  1. Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
  2. Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
  3. Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
  4. Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.

Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.

GoogleSafe Browsing GoogleWeb Risk MicrosoftSmartScreen VirusTotalURL analysis CloudflareRadar / abuse reporting YandexSafe Browsing URLScan.ioPublic scan ESETSample / URL submission BitdefenderURL submission NortonSafe Web SymantecSiteReview AviraURL reporting Avast / AVGURL reporting KasperskyOpenTIP Dr.WebOnline scanner NetcraftAbuse reporting PhishTankCommunity reporting APWG eCXPhishing intelligence PhishStatsPublic feed Phish.ReportHosting abuse SpamhausDomain reputation PolySwarmMulti-engine analysis CheckPhishURL scan QutteraMalware scan URLqueryBrowser analysis Criminal IPAsset intelligence CRDFThreat Center ScamadviserReputation check MyWOTCommunity reputation

Related infrastructure

Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains

Lookalike domains

79 stored lookalike domains

etamask.io omission Internal report meetamask.io repetition Internal report megamask.io replacement Internal report metam.ask.io subdomain Internal report metamaak.io replacement Internal report metamadk.io replacement Internal report metamaks.io transposition Internal report metamassk.io insertion Internal report metamsask.io insertion Internal report metamssk.io replacement Internal report metanask.io homoglyph Internal report metanmask.io homoglyph Internal report
Show all (67)
metasmask.io insertion Internal report metramask.io insertion Internal report mewtamask.io insertion Internal report mmetamask.io homoglyph Internal report mtamask.io omission Internal report mwetamask.io insertion Internal report nmetamask.io homoglyph Internal report metamark.io bitsquatting Internal report metamaskj.io addition Internal report metammask.io homoglyph Internal report metamnask.io homoglyph Internal report emtamask.io transposition m-etamask.io hyphenation meamask.io omission meatmask.io transposition meramask.io replacement mertamask.io insertion metaamask.io repetition metaamsk.io transposition metaask.io omission metalmask.io insertion metamaask.io insertion metamadsk.io insertion metamaek.io replacement metamak.io omission metamas.io omission metamasak.io insertion metamasdk.io insertion metamask-io.com various metamasl.io replacement metamasm.io replacement metamsak.io transposition metamsk.io omission metamusk.io vowel-swap metamzsk.io replacement metarnask.io homoglyph metmaask.io transposition metmask.io omission metsamask.io insertion metsmask.io replacement mettamask.io repetition metwmask.io replacement metyamask.io insertion metzmask.io replacement meyamask.io replacement meytamask.io insertion mitamask.io vowel-swap mnetamask.io homoglyph mretamask.io insertion mrtamask.io replacement mstamask.io replacement mteamask.io transposition mwtamask.io replacement rnetamask.io homoglyph matamask.io bitsquatting mdtamask.io bitsquatting metamasi.io bitsquatting metamasj.io bitsquatting metamaska.io addition metamaskk.io addition metamaskl.io addition metamaso.io bitsquatting metamesk.io bitsquatting metamqsk.io bitsquatting metemask.io bitsquatting netamask.io homoglyph xn--metamas-bhb.io homoglyph

Evidence & investigation tools

Original reports, independent checks and evidence links

Evidence & External Reports

Security Analysis
URLScan Analyzed VirusTotal 7 det. ChainPatrol URLQuery Report stored SSL Labs Certificate hostname mismatch CF Radar Open report OTX 4 refs WOT ScamAdviser Blacklist Checker URLVoid Sucuri SiteCheck MDN Observatory
Submitted Evidence Snapshot
Sent: Ledger records: 1 Case ID: PD-20260911-2FC59B Recipient: abuse@trellian.com
Page title stored with report: New Private Tab
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (650 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider 
Policy Violations:
Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims
Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services
Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
OSINT & Intelligence
Web-Check Full scan SOCRadar Dark web report LeakIX Leak search Shodan Censys ThreatFox Hudson Rock Sign-in search IntelX crt.sh Certs WHOIS Wayback Archived
DNS & Network
nslookup.io DNS bgp.tools ASN/Route
SEO & Domain
SpyFu Moz DA/PA Ahrefs Backlinks
Deep Analysis
Deep Analysis

Help & reporting

Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts

Help & reporting

Were You Affected by This Site?

6 evidence signal groups linked 1 stored notification records Last known active
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.

If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.

Immediate steps Find reporting contacts
Official reporting routes
PhishDestroy listing review Not a law-enforcement report
Domain Appeal
Request a review if you own this domain and believe the listing is incorrect
Beware of recovery scammers! Recovery scammers may pose as investigators, lawyers, or tracing services. Do not pay upfront fees or disclose credentials. Learn more about recovery fraud →
Report to Your Local Authorities

Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.

97-country directory

Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent

Template-based draft • optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent · Review and submit it yourself
After a phishing incident

Recommendations & Advice for Victims

Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.

What should I do immediately?

Urgent

Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.

  • Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
  • Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
  • Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the phishing site

What information should I collect for my report?

FBI guidelines

Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗

  • Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
  • Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
  • Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
  • All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including delivery-claim.cfd)
  • Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used

Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.

Where should I report the scam?

  • FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
  • Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
  • Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
  • Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately

A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.

How do phishing scams typically work?

  • Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
  • Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via Telegram/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
  • Recovery scams — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
  • AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect

How can I protect myself in the future?

  • Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
  • Verify domains — check on PhishDestroy before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
  • "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines

Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams

Check Any Domain

Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence

Scan Now

Report Phishing

Submit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community

Report

Live Threat Feed

Recent phishing reports and observed availability changes

Monitor

Stay Informed, Stay Safe

Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive

Live Threat Feed Appeal This Listing
Read the evidence in context

About This Report: delivery-claim.cfd

Stored evidence snapshot. Source timestamps appear where available.

Captured title: “delivery-claim.cfd”. Apparent target: MetaMask.

VirusTotal detections for delivery-claim.cfd: 7 (2026-09-13 02:06:16 UTC).

Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.

submit an appeal or review the FAQ page.

Embed this report

A compact widget with a link to the evidence

HTML · IFRAME

Embed This Report

Share this threat intelligence on your website or blog

embed.html 
<iframe
  src="https://phishdestroy.io/embed/domain/delivery-claim.cfd"
  title="PhishDestroy threat report for delivery-claim.cfd"
  width="100%" height="320"
  loading="lazy"
  referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
  sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%"
></iframe>