VirusTotal
7 / 91
“Arcus Stats · Arcus wallet analytics, markets & leaderboards”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@name.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Stored evidence for arcus-stats.xyz: VirusTotal recorded 4 detections among 91 scanners on 2026-09-29. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for arcus-stats.xyz. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 4 detections among 91 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-29. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-29 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for arcus-stats.xyz in the snapshot dated 2026-09-29. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains arcus-stats.xyz as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed arcus-stats.xyz on 2026-09-29. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-29 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-09-27. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
The source stores 216.198.79.1 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for arcus-stats.xyz is recorded as 2026-09-27. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The arcus-stats.xyz record states that VirusTotal recorded 4 detections among 91 scanners on 2026-09-29. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-29. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. The observed address field in this record contains 216.198.79.1. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for arcus-stats.xyz. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to arcus-stats.xyz during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain arcus-stats.xyz as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to arcus-stats.xyz. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 216.198.79.1 or to other infrastructure records.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x055d3640c23a9a02bcc761fa10a2e750a79c0e4eFormat validated · Domain analysis0x1d1a74b8aa552482b7026a5a8366964b59667722Format validated · Domain analysis0x3c9baa12789aef156936d20a3d7c861a4dff21dcFormat validated · Domain analysis0x6397d44b796aaeb5d20e0b8f9baaeb0b27f08178Format validated · Domain analysis0x8880c996750f93e4acc7769a203ec9f8ed8e9275Format validated · Domain analysis0x8c846bb7d6585defbf87adfbdc86a64d53c06543Format validated · Domain analysis0xd993dcb195be82e2357a7b4222cfc9d89d89e6c4Format validated · Domain analysis0xf91f89e188f51faaca75384ef8397fa81f254ed1Format validated · Domain analysishttps://t.me/arcusaccessbotStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-30 04:00:46 UTC
Stored crawler-versus-browser observations for this host, plus a live fingerprint check for Keitaro-style traffic distribution systems.
VercelScanner note: alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=Vercel
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP reputation is not attributed to this domain.
ns1.vercel-dns.comns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
1dd3de3675118e1f34e53290c9de0a713d6c519096c1ae7d6f1373d2c3f9582cSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of arcus-stats.xyz · checked Sep 29, 2026
216.198.79.1. 11 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
79 stored lookalike domains
PD-20260929-2A7324 Recipient: abuse@name.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (US): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 15 U.S.C. § 45 - FTC Act (Deceptive Practices) Federal laws prohibit wire fraud, computer fraud, and deceptive business practices. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowSubmit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportRecent phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorMonitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive