VirusTotal
13 / 91 engine detections
Bericht öffnen“yurft.christmas”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@spaceship.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Phishing: yurft.christmas — Nicht bestätigt. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 13/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint…
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
13 / 91 engine detections
Bericht öffnen2 threat-system alerts
Bericht öffnenSchädlich
Bericht öffnen4 community references
Bericht öffnenprovider verdict: clean
Bericht öffnen80/100
Bericht öffnenNo threat flag
Bericht öffnenResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis indicates that the domain yurft.christmas was registered on 19 May 2026 through Spaceship, Inc. and is currently active. The authoritative nameservers launch1.spaceship.net and launch2.spaceship.net resolve the domain to the IPv4 address 47.242.217.10. The infrastructure has been observed on a single security blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy feed. VirusTotal scans show that seven of ninety‑one participating security vendors have flagged the domain as malicious, reinforcing the classification of generic phishing.
The high risk rating aligns with the observed detection activity and the fact that the domain is still resolvable. Available intelligence does not include SSL certificate details, HTTP response codes, page title, or any observed payload. Consequently, the precise phishing vector, targeted brand, or credential‑capture mechanism remains undocumented. Defenders should treat the domain as hostile and block network traffic to the associated IP address and DNS name.
Updating perimeter firewalls, DNS filtering solutions, and endpoint protection with the indicator of compromise (IOC) – domain name and IP – is recommended. Continuous monitoring of the IP reputation and any emerging detections on additional blocklists will help to capture potential expansion of the campaign. Organizations using PhishDestroy or similar threat‑intel feeds should ensure the feed is applied to email gateways and web proxies to prevent user exposure. Given the recent registration date, the domain may be part of a fast‑flux or short‑lived phishing operation; therefore, periodic re‑assessment of the domain’s status is advisable.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
launch1.spaceship.netlaunch2.spaceship.netLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Erreichbar
13/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20260728-A0B60D
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceyurft.christmas
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
yurft.christmas
PD-20260728-A0B60D Recipient: abuse@spaceship.com Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
yurft.christmas)Auch wenn dir nicht alle Details bekannt sind — trotzdem Anzeige erstatten. Auch unvollständige Informationen sind für die Ermittlungen hilfreich.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.