VirusTotal
8 / 89 engine detections
Bericht öffnen“Polymarket | The World’s Largest Prediction Market™”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse+registry@porkbun.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
polymarket.reviews — Letzter bekanntermaßen aktiv (HTTP 302). Markenidentität: MetaMask; Betrugstyp: Impersonation. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 8/89 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 1 alert; Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. Registrar: Porkbun.
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
8 / 89 engine detections
Bericht öffnen1 threat-system alert
Bericht öffnenDBL_PHISH
4 community references
Bericht öffnenprovider verdict: clean
Bericht öffnen80/100
Bericht öffnenNo threat flag
Bericht öffnenNo malicious flag
Bericht öffnenResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quad9 DNS | polymarket.reviews |
malicious | Sinkholed |
AI-assisted evidence review
Stored evidence for polymarket.reviews: VirusTotal recorded 4 detections among 91 scanners on 2026-09-01. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for polymarket.reviews. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 4 detections among 91 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-01. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-01 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for polymarket.reviews in the snapshot dated 2026-08-31. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains polymarket.reviews as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed polymarket.reviews on 2026-08-31. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-08-31 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2025-12-13. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-08-31 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
For polymarket.reviews, the registrar field records Porkbun LLC; this is kept as an exact source value. The source stores 207.207.210.36 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for polymarket.reviews is recorded as 2025-12-13. The SSL issuer is recorded as Let's Encrypt / YR1 in the snapshot dated 2026-08-31. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The polymarket.reviews record states that VirusTotal recorded 4 detections among 91 scanners on 2026-09-01. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-08-31. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. For polymarket.reviews, the registrar field records Porkbun LLC; this remains separate from the other source fields. The observed address field in this record contains 207.207.210.36. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for polymarket.reviews. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to polymarket.reviews during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain polymarket.reviews as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to polymarket.reviews. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 207.207.210.36 or to other infrastructure records.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x0682990de7b862979A3cf330a1B088412eCefD43Format validated · Domain analysis0x074f41295611EB11F3582A007A66Be3cf5B66abFFormat validated · Domain analysis0x089430453ca2d23b14a626ccd687a528e2dba1c2Format validated · Domain analysis0x08bbdeb1dc07316977737af5a23f99e98f421c38Format validated · Domain analysis0x14881fc816ce914e9127c5f5a34a6fcff249409dFormat validated · Domain analysis0x162e1e84981bf0e208c2032155689eb26e607cf3Format validated · Domain analysis0x1e1f17412069c0736adfaadf8ee7f46e5612c855Format validated · Domain analysis0x1fD727a4Bc3041B6e56D8fbc19fda852E262B633Format validated · Domain analysis0x2791Bca1f2de4661ED88A30C99A7a9449Aa84174Format validated · Domain analysis0x28b164cbfa32848a6033d714d3cb9b752b7805eaFormat validated · Domain analysis0x28f283cfaf55b06244335f27ebaf34554cc10ecdFormat validated · Domain analysis0x37c1874a60d348903594a96703e0507c518fc53aFormat validated · Domain analysis0x396665c13f6ae03bbcaaf710d2364071152bbe5fFormat validated · Domain analysis0x3999f91e0c18be52ee4fddb684c426f9b531aaefFormat validated · Domain analysis0x4134CbC5fd5aa78026f1223236d1945c42FA11a4Format validated · Domain analysis0x43fd1def0cc183ffd0408d0369f5b1824d45246bFormat validated · Domain analysis0x49c2f016b9134f9232d2523bbb63634bf6a75a6dFormat validated · Domain analysis0x4cd6ac17782d95dc7a8ee2106ff8de4a52984b01Format validated · Domain analysis0x5c2171e445eb5487f1b6b37f6194dfa7864ebd2fFormat validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-01 04:45:04 UTC
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Die Edge-IP-Reputation wird dieser Domäne nicht zugeordnet.
curitiba.ns.porkbun.comfortaleza.ns.porkbun.commaceio.ns.porkbun.comsalvador.ns.porkbun.comLocation describes the IP network.
d230535337559965d327cb5523e82f7d452e4b8c230679cb3c57b6ed8a6d101dSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://flipso.com/?ref=pm; server=openresty
polymarket.reviews
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
Unbekannt→redirected
http_redirect
0→4
Erreichbar
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source8/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260831-119D7F
polymarket.reviews
View sourcePage captured
View source79 gespeicherte ähnliche Domains
PD-20260831-119D7F Recipient: abuse+registry@porkbun.com Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
polymarket.reviews)Auch wenn dir nicht alle Details bekannt sind — trotzdem Anzeige erstatten. Auch unvollständige Informationen sind für die Ermittlungen hilfreich.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.