VirusTotal
1 / 89 engine detections
Bericht öffnenjito-stak.ing.network — Letzter bekanntermaßen aktiv (HTTP 200). Markenidentität: Jito; Betrugstyp: Brand Impersonation. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 1/89 (Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy score 71/100. Registrar: Porkbun.
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
1 / 89 engine detections
Bericht öffnenno community references
Bericht öffnenNo threat flag
Bericht öffnenNo malicious flag
Bericht öffnenResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
The domain jito-stak.ing.network was registered through Porkbun LLC on May 09, 2026 and is currently classified as a high‑risk generic phishing site. Its status is listed as active and it appears on one public security blocklist. The site returns HTTP 200 responses, indicating that a web server is actively hosting content. Infrastructure analysis shows the domain resolves to the IPv4 address 52.33.207.7, which is hosted on an Amazon Web Services EC2 instance in the us‑west‑2 region of the United States. The authoritative nameservers are maceio.ns.porkbun.com, curitiba.ns.porkbun.com, and salvador.ns.porkbun.com. The site presents a valid Let’s Encrypt certificate (R12) for the host name, allowing encrypted HTTPS connections. Threat intelligence from VirusTotal records three out of ninety‑five scanners flagging the domain as malicious, and Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100. The domain is also listed as blocked by the PhishDestroy blocklist. While the low number of VirusTotal detections suggests limited public exposure, the zero trust score and blocklist inclusion indicate a high confidence of phishing use. No additional indicators such as payload hashes or command‑and‑control URLs have been observed, leaving the exact phishing content and target profile uncertain. Defenders should immediately add jito-stak.ing.network to deny lists on perimeter firewalls, DNS filtering services, and web proxy solutions. Continuous monitoring of DNS queries for the three Porkbun nameservers is recommended to detect any surge in resolution attempts. Given the active HTTPS service, TLS inspection may be required to uncover the malicious landing page. Organizations should also review any recent user reports of credential‑harvesting attempts that reference the domain or its sub‑paths.
For the registrable domain ing.network behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
fortaleza.ns.porkbun.comLocation describes the IP network.
2973726873a4e5b01813d76c5838fbd850c87d0670af232daafdbd12c9db0491ing.networkSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=openresty
jito-stak.ing.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source1/89 engine detections
View sourcejito-stak.ing.network
View sourceVon 1 Community-Mitglied gemeldet; erstmals gesehen am 09.05.2026
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
jito-stak.ing.network)Auch wenn dir nicht alle Details bekannt sind — trotzdem Anzeige erstatten. Auch unvollständige Informationen sind für die Ermittlungen hilfreich.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.