VirusTotal
checked — no detections recorded
Bericht öffnen“Bot Verification”
Gefälschter Airdrop: hyperliquid-claim.online — Inhalt nicht verfügbar. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 0 detections (engine total unavailable)…
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
checked — no detections recorded
Bericht öffnenno community references
Bericht öffnenprovider verdict: clean
Bericht öffnenNo threat flag
Bericht öffnenNo malicious flag
Bericht öffnenResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of hyperliquid-claim.online indicates a crypto-themed phishing domain impersonating Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange. The domain was registered on September 16, 2025, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and resolved to IP 82.25.113.137, hosted on AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited, FR). No SSL certificate was present, and nameservers were set to ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com. The page title, 'Bot Verification,' aligns with known airdrop scam patterns, where victims are prompted to complete fraudulent verification steps to claim non-existent crypto rewards.
Infrastructure review shows the domain was taken offline prior to July 24, 2026, though its prior activity remains under investigation. It appeared on one security blocklist (PhishDestroy) and was classified as an airdrop scam. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0/100, reflecting high suspicion. While VirusTotal scans by 95 vendors returned no active detections, this absence does not confirm safety.
The domain’s registration details, hosting provider, and scam classification suggest targeted abuse of Hyperliquid’s branding to deceive users. Defenders should treat hyperliquid-claim.online as malicious and prioritize blocking the domain and its resolving IP. Monitoring for similar domains using the same registrar, nameservers, or hosting infrastructure may help identify related threats. Further forensic analysis is recommended if logs indicate user interaction with this domain.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='hyperliquid-claim.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnec
hyperliquid-claim.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/fec12d64-7f14-4f5b-8d06-a10765e3c4a1
0 detections engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcehyperliquid-claim.online
View sourceVon 1 Community-Mitglied gemeldet; erstmals gesehen am 17.09.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
hyperliquid-claim.online)Auch wenn dir nicht alle Details bekannt sind — trotzdem Anzeige erstatten. Auch unvollständige Informationen sind für die Ermittlungen hilfreich.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.