VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
Bericht öffnen“CASE-BATTLE :: Официальный Сайт — У нас выигрывают крутые скины CS:GO”
Cs2-Imitation: casebattles.top — Nicht bestätigt. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet…
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
6 / 91 engine detections
Bericht öffnenDBL_SPAM
Scan report
Bericht öffnen4 community references
Bericht öffnenprovider verdict: clean
Bericht öffnenNo threat flag
Bericht öffnenNo malicious flag
Bericht öffnenResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
casebattles.top posed as the official site of CASE-BATTLE, a CS:GO case-opening and skin-gambling brand. Its Russian-language page title, "CASE-BATTLE :: Официальный Сайт — У нас выигрывают крутые скины CS:GO", translates as "CASE-BATTLE :: Official Site — Our players win cool CS:GO skins". It targeted Russian-speaking Counter-Strike players. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-25, and by 2026-10-19 the domain no longer resolved in DNS.
Clones of case-opening sites borrow a familiar brand name and the promise of rare skins to win a player's trust. The usual hook is a "Sign in through Steam" button that opens a fake Steam login window, which captures the username, password and Steam Guard code. Some clones also take deposits for cases that never pay out. With a hijacked Steam account, operators can trade away the victim's inventory, change recovery details and lock the owner out, so the loss is both the skins and the account.
Six of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-02: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, LevelBlue, SOCRadar and Sophos. That is a modest count, so many security products would not have warned visitors. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, and it appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which means other researchers tracked it separately. PhishDestroy lists it on our own blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2025-12-09 through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, about nine and a half months before we detected it. A long gap like this often means the domain sat parked or circulated quietly before it drew wider attention. The site was hosted on Host Sailor Ltd's network in the Netherlands. It used a free, automatically issued Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about whether the site was legitimate.
If you signed in to Steam through this site, change your Steam password from the official Steam app or client right away. Then deauthorize all other devices, check that your Steam Guard authenticator is still yours and revoke any Steam Web API key you did not create. Look through your trade history and active trade offers for transfers you did not make, and report the account theft to Steam Support. If you deposited money or skins, report it to your payment provider quickly. Security teams should block the domain and look for close variants imitating CASE-BATTLE that target the same players.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns3.my-ndns.comns4.my-ndns.comLocation describes the IP network.
92038c79a27d0e9d2ac86d0b8ad6dea3e11e59a767f2cea41ea4e6182e04dc3aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.casebattles.topDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of casebattles.top · checked Sep 25, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
casebattles.top
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
live_content→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
Unbekannt→live_content
content_served
2→Observation retained
3→2
2→3
0→2
Erreichbar
No threat flag
View source6/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20260925-A55686
casebattles.top
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260925-A55686 Recipient: abuse@hostsailor.com Registrar: NICENIC International Group Co., Limited (Hong Kong (China)) Policy Violations: “Services may be used only for lawful purposes… fraud, abuse and illegal activity prohibited. Violations may result in immediate suspension.” + dedicated abuse handling and takedown Applicable Laws: Crimes Ordinance Cap.200 (Fraud), Theft Ordinance Cap.210 §16A (fraud by deception), Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance Cap.486
Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
casebattles.top)Auch wenn dir nicht alle Details bekannt sind — trotzdem Anzeige erstatten. Auch unvollständige Informationen sind für die Ermittlungen hilfreich.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.