VirusTotal
4 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Decentralized Dapps - We are unifying Web3 by providing best-in-class, self-custodial, and multicha…”
أداة استنزاف محافظ العملات المشفرة: yo-dev.website — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 4/95 (CRDF, Ermes, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); 3 external blocklist…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
4 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain yo-dev.website, created on 12 October 2025 and registered through Hostinger Operations UAB, shows a high‑risk crypto drainer campaign targeting MetaMask users. The site served a fake airdrop page whose title reads “Decentralized Dapps – We are unifying Web3 by providing best‑in‑class, self‑custodial, and multichain support”, a phrasing commonly used to lend legitimacy to Web3‑related scams. No TLS certificate is present, and the domain resolves to the IP address 77.37.34.61, which is allocated to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited in the United Kingdom. The hosting infrastructure is listed under the generic parking nameservers ns1.dns‑parking.com and ns2.dns‑parking.com.
VirusTotal scans recorded four detections out of ninety‑five security vendors, confirming malicious activity. The Gridinsoft trust score is 0 out of 100, reinforcing the assessment of a malicious payload. The campaign leverages the Angel Drainer kit, a known tool for draining cryptocurrency wallets, and explicitly impersonates the MetaMask brand, aligning with the “Fake Airdrop” scam type. The domain has been added to at least four security blocklists and is currently blocked by services such as PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura.
Although the site is presently taken offline, the underlying infrastructure—particularly the hosting IP and the Angel Drainer payload—remains usable for future campaigns. Defenders should continue to block the domain and its resolved IP at perimeter defenses, update intrusion‑detection signatures to flag the Angel Drainer fingerprint, and monitor for new domains registered by the same registrar that reuse the same page title or similar naming patterns. Ongoing threat‑intel feeds should be consulted for any resurgence of the campaign, and users of MetaMask should be warned about unsolicited airdrop offers that reference the same wording.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='yo-dev.website', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError(
yo-dev.website
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/a59b5dad-1ebe-4ddc-a0c4-aba8f50be5c3
4/95 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceyo-dev.website
View source٧٩ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
أبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 14/10/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا تفاعلت مع هذا المجال، أو أدخلت معلومات شخصية، أو قمت بالاتصال بمحفظة عملة مشفرة، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
يُقدَّر أن $51 billion تدفقت إلى محافظ عملات مشفرة غير مشروعة في عام 2024 (source). إذا كنت قد تفاعلت مع yo-dev.website — تصرف الآن.
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
وفقًا لـ مكتب التحقيقات الفيدرالي (FBI)، وأهم التفاصيل هي بيانات المعاملات:
0x5856...35985)yo-dev.website)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.