VirusTotal
4 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Portfolio | Jupiter”
أداة استنزاف محافظ العملات المشفرة: www-jup.network — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 4/95 (CRDF, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); Spamhaus…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
4 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرDBL_PHISH
no community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of www-jup.network indicates that the site was operated as a wallet/seed phishing platform targeting users of the Jupiter brand. The page title observed during collection was "Portfolio | Jupiter," confirming the attempt to masquerade as an official Jupiter portal. Technical investigation shows the domain resolves to IP address 188.114.97.3, which is hosted within the United States and belongs to ASN 13335, the Cloudflare network. Both authoritative name servers, ezra.ns.cloudflare.com and jocelyn.ns.cloudflare.com, are Cloudflare‑provided, consistent with the registration record that lists Cloudflare, Inc. as the registrar.
No SSL certificate was presented, meaning the site served traffic over plain HTTP, a common characteristic of malicious drop sites seeking to avoid the cost and scrutiny of TLS deployment. The infrastructure was flagged by four of ninety‑five VirusTotal scanners, indicating that a minority of security engines identified malicious behavior associated with the domain. Additionally, the site appears on a single security blocklist and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy feed, providing external corroboration of its malicious intent. The drainer kit employed is identified as a Solana drainer, aligning with the wallet/seed phishing classification and suggesting the objective was to harvest private keys or seed phrases for Solana‑based assets.
Current status reports show the domain has been taken offline, which may temporarily reduce exposure but does not eliminate the risk of residual artifacts such as cached URLs or persisted phishing links in user inboxes. Defenders should update URL filtering rules to include www-jup.network, enforce strict outbound DNS controls for Cloudflare‑hosted domains, and monitor for any residual indicators of compromise related to Solana wallet credentials.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
ezra.ns.cloudflare.comjocelyn.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='www-jup.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
www-jup.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/b851688f-3373-4ce0-9ee7-66ea9f53ad59
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4/95 engine detections
View sourcewww-jup.network
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 12/10/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا تفاعلت مع هذا المجال، أو أدخلت معلومات شخصية، أو قمت بالاتصال بمحفظة عملة مشفرة، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
يُقدَّر أن $51 billion تدفقت إلى محافظ عملات مشفرة غير مشروعة في عام 2024 (source). إذا كنت قد تفاعلت مع www-jup.network — تصرف الآن.
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
وفقًا لـ مكتب التحقيقات الفيدرالي (FBI)، وأهم التفاصيل هي بيانات المعاملات:
0x5856...35985)www-jup.network)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.