VirusTotal
6 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Raydium | Airdrop”
أداة استنزاف محافظ العملات المشفرة: ray-protocol.network — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 6/95 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, CyRadar, Fortinet…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
6 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرDBL_PHISH
1 community reference
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of ray-protocol.network as of 24 July 2026 indicates that the site is part of a high‑risk crypto drainer campaign targeting users of the Phantom wallet. The page title observed during collection reads "Raydium | Airdrop", which aligns with the reported fake‑airdrop lure. The infrastructure is hosted behind Cloudflare, Inc., with the domain registered through the same provider. DNS resolution points to IP 172.67.150.126, an address owned by AS13335 Cloudflare in the United States. No TLS certificate was presented, meaning the site served content over plain HTTP.
Reputation signals show the domain appears on four security blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura. AlienVault OTX includes the domain in a single threat‑intel pulse. VirusTotal analysis recorded six detections out of ninety‑five scanning engines, reinforcing the malicious classification. The nameservers in use are dimitris.ns.cloudflare.com and khloe.ns.cloudflare.com, both typical of Cloudflare‑managed domains. The observed malicious components include a Solana‑based drainer kit, identified as a "Solana Drainer", and the broader phishing kit is labeled "Airdrop Scam".
The campaign impersonates the Phantom wallet brand, attempting to lure victims into authorising transactions that transfer assets to attacker‑controlled addresses. Current status shows the domain has been taken offline, but the underlying infrastructure—particularly the Cloudflare‑proxied IP and the nameserver configuration—could be re‑used for future campaigns. Uncertainty remains regarding the exact timing of the domain’s activation and any additional payloads that may have been delivered before takedown. Defenders should continue to monitor the IP address 172.67.150.126 and the associated Cloudflare nameservers for reappearance, enforce strict URL filtering for the domain and any sub‑domains, and apply endpoint rules that block Solana transaction requests to unknown smart contracts.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
dimitris.ns.cloudflare.comkhloe.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ray-protocol.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
ray-protocol.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/b3f6a098-e1ae-4a5f-a30b-a11b25b58f07
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View source6/95 engine detections
View sourceray-protocol.network
View source٣ نطاقات متشابهة محفوظة
أبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 20/10/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا تفاعلت مع هذا المجال، أو أدخلت معلومات شخصية، أو قمت بالاتصال بمحفظة عملة مشفرة، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
يُقدَّر أن $51 billion تدفقت إلى محافظ عملات مشفرة غير مشروعة في عام 2024 (source). إذا كنت قد تفاعلت مع ray-protocol.network — تصرف الآن.
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
وفقًا لـ مكتب التحقيقات الفيدرالي (FBI)، وأهم التفاصيل هي بيانات المعاملات:
0x5856...35985)ray-protocol.network)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.