VirusTotal
13 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Kaito”
أداة استنزاف محافظ العملات المشفرة: lombard-lux.finance — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 13/91 (ADMINUSLabs, ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
13 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of lombard-lux.finance as of July 24, 2026 indicates that the domain is currently offline but was previously used as a crypto‑drainer targeting MetaMask users. The site resolved to the Cloudflare edge address 104.21.32.1, hosted in the United States under ASN 13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.). Its authoritative nameservers, ignacio.ns.cloudflare.com and miki.ns.cloudflare.com, confirm that the infrastructure relied on Cloudflare’s DNS service. Registration was handled by Web Commerce Communications Limited, a registrar commonly associated with bulk‑registered domains.
No TLS certificate was served, meaning the site operated without HTTPS encryption. The page title observed during the brief capture was “Kaito,” and the campaign employed the Angel Drainer kit, a known tool for siphoning cryptocurrency assets. VirusTotal records show that ten of ninety‑five scanning engines flagged the domain as malicious, and the domain appears on two public blocklists, specifically PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of zero out of one hundred, reinforcing the malicious assessment.
The domain explicitly impersonated the MetaMask brand, aligning with the reported fake‑airdrop scam type. While the domain is now taken offline, defenders should continue to monitor the associated IP address and Cloudflare nameservers for reuse, add the domain and its IP to internal blocklists, and enforce strict URL filtering for any requests to lombard‑lux.finance. Network traffic to the resolved IP should be inspected for signs of the Angel Drainer payload, and endpoint protection should be updated to recognize the identified indicators of compromise. Because the site lacked HTTPS, any credential capture would have occurred over cleartext, further emphasizing the need for robust user education on verifying TLS connections when interacting with MetaMask‑related services.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
ignacio.ns.cloudflare.commiki.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='lombard-lux.finance', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
lombard-lux.finance
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/e29b9702-efaa-41d6-992c-418bdb3de897
13/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcelombard-lux.finance
View source٧٩ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
أبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 11/09/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا تفاعلت مع هذا المجال، أو أدخلت معلومات شخصية، أو قمت بالاتصال بمحفظة عملة مشفرة، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
يُقدَّر أن $51 billion تدفقت إلى محافظ عملات مشفرة غير مشروعة في عام 2024 (source). إذا كنت قد تفاعلت مع lombard-lux.finance — تصرف الآن.
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
وفقًا لـ مكتب التحقيقات الفيدرالي (FBI)، وأهم التفاصيل هي بيانات المعاملات:
0x5856...35985)lombard-lux.finance)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.