VirusTotal
1 / 93 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Logistics Airway - Transport and Logistics”
تصيد بيانات الدخول: logisticsairway.express — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 1/93 (Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy score 56/100. مسجّل النطاق: Global…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
1 / 93 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, logisticsairway.express, is currently flagged as an active credential-phishing site with a high-risk classification. Analysis indicates the domain was registered on February 21, 2026, through Global Domain Group LLC and is hosted on IP address 163.61.188.222, which is associated with AS153568 (NEW DHAKA HARDWARE) and geolocated in the United States. The domain resolves to a server returning an HTTP 200 status, suggesting the phishing page is operational. No SSL certificate is present, increasing the likelihood of interception or detection by security controls. The page title, 'Logistics Airway - Transport and Logistics,' explicitly aligns with the logistics and transportation sector, indicating the phishing campaign is likely targeting professionals or entities within this industry. The domain is classified as credential-phishing, though the specific tactics, such as whether it employs fake login portals or document lures, remain unconfirmed due to the absence of deeper content analysis. Infrastructure analysis reveals the use of Cloudflare nameservers (ziggy.ns.cloudflare.com and rommy.ns.cloudflare.com), a common obfuscation technique to mask the true hosting origin and complicate takedown efforts. Defenders should note that the domain appears on one security blocklist, and one out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal has flagged it as malicious. While this detection rate is low, the combination of missing SSL, active HTTP 200 response, and sector-specific branding warrants immediate blocking at the network and endpoint levels. The domain’s creation date, less than five months prior to this report, suggests it is part of a recent campaign, and its continued activity indicates it has not yet been mitigated. Organizations in the logistics and transportation sectors are advised to treat this domain as hostile and monitor for any attempted interactions from internal assets.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
rommy.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='logisticsairway.express', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnect
logisticsairway.express
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourcelogisticsairway.express
View source1/93 engine detections
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 07/08/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
logisticsairway.express)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.