VirusTotal
21 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Facebook – log in or sign up”
انتحال Facebook: g-mail.digital — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 21/95 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Certego, CRDF, CyRadar); URLQuery 100 det.…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
21 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير100 det.
Threat flag recorded
فتح التقريرضار
فتح التقريرchecked — no match recorded
17 community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
g-mail.digital is assessed as a high-risk domain for brand impersonation. This domain is designed to mimic Facebook, likely to deceive users into providing sensitive information such as login credentials or personal data. The risk level is high due to the domain's involvement in multiple threat intelligence reports and its current status of being flagged by security vendors.
Analysis indicates that g-mail.digital has been flagged in 17 threat intelligence pulses on AlienVault OTX, suggesting a significant level of malicious activity associated with the domain. VirusTotal reports that 21 out of 95 security vendors have flagged this domain, indicating a moderate level of consensus among security experts regarding its malicious nature. The domain is registered through Name.com, Inc and resolves to the IP address 16.16.167.230. It was created on November 30, 2025, which is a relatively recent date, often a common characteristic of malicious domains. Additionally, the domain appears on 2 security blocklists and lacks an SSL certificate, further raising concerns about its security and legitimacy. Google Safe Browsing has also flagged the domain for phishing, confirming the brand impersonation threat.
To mitigate the risk of brand impersonation associated with g-mail.digital, users should avoid clicking on any links or entering personal information on the site. Organizations should update their security policies to include this domain in their blocklists and educate employees about the dangers of brand impersonation attacks. Network administrators should monitor for any attempts to access this domain and implement DNS filtering to prevent access. Additionally, reporting the domain to the relevant brand (Facebook) and the domain registrar (Name.com, Inc) can help in taking further action to shut down the malicious activity and protect users.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1glr.name.comns2clp.name.comns3ghw.name.comns4cpw.name.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='g-mail.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError(
g-mail.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/d30b69bd-49b1-4967-8257-40caea10d28e
21/95 engine detections
View source17 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourceThreat flag recorded
View sourceg-mail.digital
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 08/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
g-mail.digital)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.