VirusTotal
4 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Airdrop Crypto”
إسقاط جوي مزيف: duplicate-disabled-642.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 4/91 (Chong Lua Dao, ESET, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky); PhishDestroy…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
4 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرPage capture
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain www.airdropcrypto.net indicates a confirmed brand impersonation campaign targeting Adobe, classified as a fake airdrop scam. The domain was registered on June 6, 2021, through Name.com, Inc., and resolves to the IPv6 address 2a00:1450:4001:812::2013, hosted on Google LLC infrastructure (AS15169) in Germany. The SSL certificate is issued by Google Trust Services (WR3), a common pattern for domains leveraging Google-hosted services. The page title, 'Airdrop Crypto,' aligns with the identified phishing kit labeled 'Airdrop Scam,' suggesting the domain was designed to deceive users into engaging with fraudulent cryptocurrency distributions under the guise of an Adobe-related offer.
Detection metrics reveal limited but targeted blocking: the domain appears on one security blocklist and is flagged by PhishDestroy. VirusTotal reports four detections out of 95 security vendors, indicating moderate but not universal recognition of the threat. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0/100, further corroborating its malicious classification. Infrastructure analysis reveals the use of Name.com nameservers (ns1cmt.name.com, ns2gtx.name.com, ns3dkz.name.com, ns4lqx.name.com) and technologies such as Blogger, Java, Python, Bootstrap, OpenGSE, Cloudflare, OneSignal, and Modernizr, which are consistent with scalable phishing operations.
The domain is currently offline, though its historical activity and registration details remain relevant for threat correlation. Defenders should treat this domain as a confirmed impersonation vector, particularly for campaigns leveraging Adobe’s brand to propagate cryptocurrency scams. Monitoring for re-registration or similar domains under the same registrar or hosting provider is recommended. No additional evidence links or payload samples were provided in the available intelligence, limiting further technical attribution.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/AidropCriptoChannelStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-03 04:03:54 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1cmt.name.comns2gtx.name.comns3dkz.name.comns4lqx.name.comLocation describes the IP network.
08af4654aa7894b53ce99140c8e1017559c4757b4b60d6b6f080c5176eb28bb2Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-642.invalid · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
4/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceduplicate-disabled-642.invalid
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
duplicate-disabled-642.invalid
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-642.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.