VirusTotal
3 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Fortrone”
انتحال Across: duplicate-disabled-616.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 3/95 (ChainPatrol, Seclookup, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 65/100.…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
3 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرPage capture
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, www.fortrone.com, is flagged as a high-risk brand impersonation threat specifically targeting the Across platform. Analysis indicates the site is designed to deceive users by mimicking legitimate branding, leveraging social engineering tactics to harvest credentials or distribute malicious payloads. The threat type is classified as brand impersonation, a technique commonly employed to exploit trust in established entities for fraudulent purposes.
Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on September 27, 2023, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a registrar frequently associated with malicious activity. It resolves to the IPv6 address 2a02:4780:b:926:0:1fee:cd1c:2, hosted under AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in the United States. The domain lacks an SSL certificate, increasing the risk of interception or manipulation of transmitted data. Detection metrics indicate limited but concerning visibility: VirusTotal reports 3 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious. Additionally, the domain appears on one security blocklist and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, further corroborating its malicious classification. No legitimate use cases or historical benign activity have been identified.
Mitigation measures should prioritize blocking the domain and its associated infrastructure at the network perimeter. Organizations should deploy indicators of compromise (IOCs) such as the domain, IP address, and registrar details into security monitoring systems to detect and prevent access. End-user awareness training is critical to educate personnel on recognizing brand impersonation tactics, particularly those mimicking Across or similar platforms. Given the domain's recent registration and active status, continuous monitoring for related infrastructure (e.g., newly registered domains under the same registrar) is recommended to preemptively disrupt evolving campaigns.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-616.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by New
duplicate-disabled-616.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source3/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-616.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-616.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.