VirusTotal
13 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Exchange | PancakeSwap”
انتحال PancakeSwap: duplicate-disabled-5447.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 13/95 (Criminal IP, BitDefender, CyRadar, Forcepoint…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
13 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير100 det.
ضار
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of www.pancakeswap.gho-v4.com indicates a high‑confidence brand‑impersonation operation targeting users of PancakeSwap. The domain was registered on 31 August 2025 through PublicDomainRegistry.com (PDR Ltd.) and resolves to IP 45.134.10.34, which is hosted in the United States under ASN 400529 (Infraly, LLC). The authoritative name servers are ns1.webservercp.com and ns2.webservercp.com, typical of low‑cost web‑hosting services. No TLS certificate is presented, leaving the site reachable only over HTTP, which further reduces the credibility of the infrastructure.
The page title returned from the live endpoint before takedown was "Exchange | PancakeSwap", matching the legitimate brand’s terminology and reinforcing the impersonation claim. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 / 100, and VirusTotal recorded 13 positive detections out of 95 scanning engines, confirming malicious classification by multiple vendors. The domain is currently offline, having been seized by the takedown service PhishDestroy and listed on one security blocklist. While the exact content of the landing page has not been captured, the combination of brand‑matching title, crypto‑scam labeling, and malicious scoring suggests a cryptocurrency‑draining or fraudulent exchange façade.
Defenders should continue to block the IP address 45.134.10.34, add the domain to internal deny lists, and monitor for any re‑hosting attempts under similar sub‑domains. Threat‑intel teams should also flag the registrar PublicDomainRegistry.com for potential abuse and share the indicator set with partner ISPs and email security gateways to prevent credential harvesting or fund diversion attempts. Ongoing observation is advised in case the actors pivot to new domains with similar naming patterns.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x0e09fabb73bd3ade0a17ecc321fd13a19e81ce82Format validated · Domain analysishttps://t.me/PancakeSwapAnnStored page referencehttps://t.me/PancakeSwapSouthKoreaStored page referencehttps://t.me/PancakeSwapVNStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswapStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswapESStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswapIndonesiaStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswapJPStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswapPortugueseStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswap_CNStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswap_INDIAStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswap_PHStored page referencehttps://t.me/pancakeswap_ruStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-03 04:00:44 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.webservercp.comns2.webservercp.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-5447.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-5447.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source13/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-5447.invalid
View source٨٣ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-5447.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.