VirusTotal
2 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Solana Volume Bot - Best Volume Bot for Solana Blockchain Trading”
Analysis of www.solanavolumebot.world shows a newly registered domain (creation 28 Oct 2025) that actively impersonates the Solana brand.
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
2 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of www.solanavolumebot.world shows a newly registered domain (creation 28 Oct 2025) that actively impersonates the Solana brand. The site presents the page title “Solana Volume Bot – Best Volume Bot for Solana Blockchain Trading”, indicating a direct brand reference. Registration was performed through Name.com, Inc, and the TLS certificate is issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 root, confirming a legitimate‑looking HTTPS endpoint. The HTTP response is a 301 redirect, which can be used to forward victims to malicious content while preserving the original URL in logs.
Network resolution points to IP 64.29.17.1, hosted in the United States under ASN 16509 (Amazon.com, Inc.), a common cloud provider that offers attackers rapid provisioning and anonymity. Reputation data is uniformly negative: Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 / 100, the domain is listed on one external security blocklist, and PhishDestroy has already blocked it. VirusTotal analysis records a single positive detection out of 95 scanned vendors, confirming that at least one security product flags the domain as malicious. The indicated scam type is wallet/seed phishing, targeting users who may search for Solana trading tools and could be lured into entering private keys or seed phrases.
The risk rating is high and the status remains active as of the report date (24 Jul 2026). Uncertainties include the exact payload delivered after the redirect and whether additional infrastructure (command‑and‑control servers or credential‑harvesting pages) exists beyond the observed IP. Defenders should immediately add the domain to deny‑list rules at DNS and proxy layers, monitor for outbound connections to 64.29.17.1, and enforce strict verification of any Solana‑related service URLs. Incident response teams should treat any credential submissions to this domain as compromised, initiate user notifications, and consider broader threat‑intel correlation with other Solana‑impersonating artifacts.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
Location describes the IP network.
1390cde4a8d09f3247fe18e9e23b6f5175d080f0c9a477e7f8b9b9f71fe9eb90solanavolumebot.worldSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-34683.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by N
duplicate-disabled-34683.invalid
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
يمكن الوصول إليه→غير متوفر
2/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceduplicate-disabled-34683.invalid
View source١١٨ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
عرض 100 من 118
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-34683.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.