VirusTotal
15 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرتصيد: duplicate-disabled-2990.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 15/95 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, ArcSight Threat Intelligence…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
15 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير1 community reference
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain www.scfnl.org was registered on December 10, 2024 through Name.com, Inc. and is currently taken offline. DNS resolution points to the IP address 63.176.8.218, which belongs to Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) and is geolocated in Germany. The host does not present an SSL/TLS certificate, indicating that any HTTP connections would be unencrypted. Reputation scoring from Gridinsoft is 0 out of 100, and the domain appears on a single security blocklist.
It is listed on PhishDestroy and has been referenced in one AlienVault OTX pulse, suggesting prior detection by the threat‑intelligence community. VirusTotal analysis shows that 15 of 95 scanned security vendors flagged the domain, reinforcing the suspicion of malicious activity. Nameserver configuration uses the nsone.net service (dns1‑dns4.p06.nsone.net). No public page title or content snapshot is available, so the exact phishing lure or targeted brand cannot be confirmed at this time.
The combination of a newly created domain, low trust score, lack of TLS, and multiple vendor detections indicates a heightened risk of credential‑ harvesting or other phishing tactics. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeter devices, update DNS blacklists with the observed IP and nameserver set, and monitor for any re‑appearance or new resolution attempts. Further forensic collection of HTTP traffic, if the site resurfaces, would be required to identify the specific payload and victim‑targeting patterns.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
dns1.p06.nsone.netdns2.p06.nsone.netdns3.p06.nsone.netdns4.p06.nsone.netLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-2990.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-2990.invalid
15/95 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View sourceduplicate-disabled-2990.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-2990.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.